Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 74, Issue 8: Problems running ECLIPSE model using FLOW

are okay after you apply any other adjustments, then put back the full SCHEDULE minus the UDQ/UDA variables and keywords that use them variables. Does that run? OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 27-Apr-22 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send Opm mailing list submissions to opm

[Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 74, Issue 7: Problems running ECLIPSE model using FLOW

Alun, There are bunch of keywords that are indeed unsupported. Looking at the static keywords first: These keywords are not important and can be ignored. *  ECHO: keyword not supported *  NOECHO: keyword not supported *  NSTACK: keyword not supported *  MESSAGES: invalid value

[Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 74, Issue 2: Problems running ECLIPSE model using FLOW.

GEFF not found" / Can you either send me the model or at least the *.DBG and *.PRT files, and when I have a minute I'll take a look. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 19-Apr-22 21:09, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wr

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 68, Issue 2

the keywords for you in the same format as the manual. You still have to edit the values, but the format and the examples should help. If you need any help with this let me know. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 07-Sep-21 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send Opm mailing list submissions

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

en and may best left for one of the core developers due to having to reverse engineer the output format. 4. Updating the manual. I can do this, I just need to know what has been implemented compared with the commercial simulator. Good luck and enjoy the ride. OPM User opmus...@gma

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1

d just hook them up to SUMMARY output. I still think that default behavior of having nothing in the DEBUG file is the correct default., as per the commercial simulators behavior. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 03-Jun-21 18:36, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send Opm mailing list submissions

[Opm] CPR and Find Facility

ted to WSL - just need to find some time. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] How to suppress message "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key"

Tsuyoshi, I'm running the exact same configuration in a VM and I don't have this, can you post a short example so we can see what is happening. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 03-Aug-20 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send Opm mailing list submissions to opm@opm

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 53, Issue 3

Stephen, I'll bite. Send me the model and I'll take look from a RE prospective - not promising anything. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 27-Jun-20 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send Opm mailing list submissions to opm@opm-project.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via

Re: [Opm] Cell Convergence Debugging

rate - that would be fun. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Cell Convergence Debugging

:-). I don't' have a general solution to this, but I have resolve a few cases of the above due to data inconsistencies. Release 2020-04 is out, so perhaps you can try your model with the new release. || OPM User opmus...@gmail.com ___ Opm mailing list

[Opm] GECON equivalent.

the WECON keyword END option (item eight on the keyword)? So that when the condition is met, set this parameter for all wells. Of course the correct solution would be to implement the GECON keyword. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com > I am guessing that the END overrides the ACTIONX ope

Re: [Opm] Convergence Problems - New Shale Well Model (Resend w/o attach)

Neale, The email with the results has been automatically held until the list moderator can review it for approval. So I have just sent the text instead in this email. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com Neale, I had a quick look

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 48, Issue 4

a considerable effort documenting all the keywords both in the code and the manual, which is why I wanted to clarify this. Just in case one of the developer's asks "but I thought we covered all the keywords in the last release". **I hope you get the resources to implement this feature. OPM

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 45, Issue 2

Arne Morten, I would personally appreciate an  Unbuntu 18.04 mpi release. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com the current debian stable (buster) has 2.6. for the previous (stretch) i had to backport for jenkins. i have also successfully fixed the ubuntu 18.04 mpi packages. it's a pretty simple fix

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 42, Issue 2

h modeling software came along. I think the manual is correct, but if you let me know what you think should be changed I'll take it into consideration for the next release (2019-10). Glad you found a solution. OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 21-Jun-19 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: Send O

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 41, Issue 1

activated using --enable-tracer-model=true OPM User opmus...@gmail.com On 04-May-19 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote: release 2019.04 rc3 is available in the testing ppa. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com