Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Hi Srikanth, I would try switching to Boron SR2 (0.5.2) BR, George From: Srikanth Lingala [mailto:srikanth.ling...@nxp.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 9:33 AM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios ; Brady Allen Johnson ;

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Danube] [Documentation] Organization of testing section

yes see minutes http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-testperf/2017/opnfv-testperf.2017-03-02-15.00.html docs ├── release │ └── release-notes └── testing ├── developer └── user see https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/docs as an illustration and for the title (not written

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project Proposal Announcement: Nextgen VIM Scheduler (NGVS)

On 03/03/2017 05:46 AM, Amar Kapadia wrote: All, We are announcing a new project proposal: Nextgen VIM Scheduler (NGVS). The current scheduler (OpenStack Nova) works very well, but we anticipate a number of new requirements: 1) Ability to schedule VMs, containers and unikernels - possibly in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project directory page on the wiki

Looks good to me! It makes sense to automate as much as possible the maintenance of project information, since otherwise the information easily gets out of sync. Would it be possible to add the project one-liners as suggested in one of the comments? -Tapio On 03/03/2017 08:53 AM, Raymond

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Hi Srikanth, Which ODL version are you using? We had some issues too in Colorado with multicompute setups. BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017

[opnfv-tech-discuss] New project directory page on the wiki

All, I decided to replace the old "approved projects" page ( https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Approved+Projects) with a full project directory page (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Directory) that Mark Beierl started last year. I made some updates and checked to make sure all

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Fwd: Invitation: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting @ Fri Mar 3, 2017 8am - 9am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

Hi All, Unfortunately, we'll have to reschedule this meeting for another slot due to a bridge conflict with another project. Will send an updated invite for sometime next week. Thanks, Vikram > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Vikram Dham > Subject: Re:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:[ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting DESCRIPTION:Attaching calendar invite.\n\nHi\,\n\nWelcome to the first meet ing of the project ovn4nfv.\n\n1. Current state of OVN (Russell Bryant)\n2 . State of OVN based

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:[ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting DESCRIPTION:Attaching calendar invite.\n\nHi\,\n\nWelcome to the first meet ing of the project ovn4nfv.\n\n1. Current state of OVN (Russell Bryant)\n2 . State of OVN based

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled Event: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting @ Fri Mar 3, 2017 8am - 9am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20170303T16Z DTEND:20170303T17Z DTSTAMP:20170303T045807Z ORGANIZER;CN=Vikram Dham:mailto:vikramd...@gmail.com UID:jo53mbnhgkumafp41pi8ns1...@google.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Invitation: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting @ Fri Mar 3, 2017 8am - 9am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

Hi Bin, I followed the calendar but looks like it is not updated. Looks like I will need to go ahead and reschedule ovn4nfv meeting :( Thanks, Vikram > On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:55 PM, HU, BIN wrote: > > Vikram, > > This meeting time (8am PST Friday) conflicts with IPv6 meeting

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Project Proposal Announcement: Nextgen VIM Scheduler (NGVS)

All, We are announcing a new project proposal: Nextgen VIM Scheduler (NGVS). The current scheduler (OpenStack Nova) works very well, but we anticipate a number of new requirements: 1) Ability to schedule VMs, containers and unikernels - possibly in the same service function chain 2) Need to use

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Weekly Technical Discussion #81

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Invitation: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting @ Fri Mar 3, 2017 8am - 9am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

Vikram, This meeting time (8am PST Friday) conflicts with IPv6 meeting (standing meeting every other week), which uses the same even hour bridge. Thanks Bin -Original Appointment- From: Vikram Dham [mailto:vikramd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 3:55 PM To: Vikram Dham;

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Summary of Weekly Technical Community Discussion Thursday March 02

cenario Descriptor<http://artifacts.opnfv.org/octopus/review/28443/scenario-lifecycle/index.html> (scenario consolidation<https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Scenario+Consolidation>) and its support of Continuous Delivery Release Model Thanks Bin [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip] Agenda for weekly meeting 2017-03-06

https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2017-03-06 *# QTIP project weekly meeting on 2017-03-06* - time: UTC0730 - irc://#opnfv-qtip@freenode - index: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings *## Action followup* - all review api requirement and comment

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Danube] [Documentation] Organization of testing section

Have we get an agreement on the document structure now? Sorry that I missed yesterday's meeting. -- Yujun On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:54 PM wrote: > And just to precise - the last table from my first mail could be > mlisleading (we will exchange tomorrow during the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS7 - stable branch window closes March 10

Yes, that's true. - D On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Yujun Zhang (ZTE) wrote: > Hi, David > > Does that mean the branch will be created anyway by Mar 10th? > > I need to get it confirmed since I will be on business trip next week. It > would be very helpful if LF can

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 3/3

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [sfc-dev] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

I didn’t try this, so I haven’t any details, will opnfv sfc have such use case? The below command can check if the packet is dropped or not sudo ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows br-int From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Brady

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Invitation: [ovn4nfv]Project kickoff meeting @ Fri Mar 3, 2017 8am - 9am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20170303T16Z DTEND:20170303T17Z DTSTAMP:20170302T235457Z ORGANIZER;CN=Vikram Dham:mailto:vikramd...@gmail.com UID:jo53mbnhgkumafp41pi8ns1...@google.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovn4nfv] Project kickoff meeting

Hi Mark, Thanks for bringing this up. Let me know if you would like to share your thoughts about using OVN with dpdk in tomorrow’s call. Thanks, Vikram > On Feb 28, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Gray, Mark D wrote: > > Hi, > > As we are dealing with high packet rates for NFV

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS7 - stable branch window closes March 10

PTLs, The stable branch window for Danube opened on February 17 (MS6). The window will close one week from Friday, on March 10 at 12 p.m. (PST). Please plan to branch your project by that date. Any projects not branched by the PTL by MS7 will be branched by LF (Aric). You may find tagging

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call DESCRIPTION:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call \n\nPlease join my meeting from your computer\, tablet or smartphone. \nhttps://global.gotomeeting.com/join/15 8053245 \n\nYou can also

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call DESCRIPTION:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call \n\nPlease join my meeting from your computer\, tablet or smartphone. \nhttps://global.gotomeeting.com/join/15 8053245 \n\nYou can also

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Update] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

Deleted. Thanks all. Min -- Min Yu Senior Client Services Coordinator The Linux Foundation +1(530) 902-6464 (m) m...@linuxfoundation.org Skype: minyudecorah On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Margaret Chiosi (A) < margaret.chio...@huawei.com> wrote: > Sorry I had sent a note saying these were

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call DESCRIPTION:OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call \n\nPlease join my meeting from your computer\, tablet or smartphone. \nhttps://global.gotomeeting.com/join/15 8053245 \n\nYou can also

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 3/3

I would suggest we reorder the topics a little bit for more natural flow and efficiency: 1) Dovetail Danube planning: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Dovetail_Danube_Planning, and quick intro on Jira Kanban and Danube release organization. �C Wenjing, 20 min. 2) Jira test suite

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][dovetail] OpenStack HTTPS transport support in functest/dovetail

Great point Tomofumi. I will take this topic to tomorrow’s Dovetail call. From Dovetail perspective, even if we do not impose the HTTPS-only hardening, we must at least support such systems. Thanks. Wenjing From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Update] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

Sorry I had sent a note saying these were suspended since I am now traveling a lot. From: Bugenhagen, Michael To: Ash Young; Neary, Dave; Cc: paul...@emc.com; Margaret Chiosi; Healy, John; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; FORD, TOBY; dick.c...@ztetx.com; WRIGHT, STEVEN A; Yu, Min;

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Update] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

I had the same question… If they aren’t cancelled we need to ask for calming “on hold” music. ☺ From: on behalf of Ash Young Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM To: "dne...@redhat.com" Cc:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Update] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call

I just deleted the recurring event, myself. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2017, at 08:06, dne...@redhat.com wrote: > > Hi, > > I thought these calls were cancelled? I still see this on my calendar. > > Dave. > > OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call > OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call > Please join my

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Fault Genes Weekly Meeting

Please call in. -Original Appointment- From: Nematollah Bidokhti Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 3:04 PM To: Nematollah Bidokhti; 'six9srelia...@yahoo.com'; 'michael.zhou...@gmail.com'; sebastian.wen...@t-systems.com; kurt-friedrich.garl...@t-systems.com; 'z.n...@t-systems.com'; Omer

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [sfc-dev] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Brady, On which interface, you want me do tcpdump in the compute node. As br-int is OVS port, we can’t see packets on that. Regards, Srikanth. From: Brady Allen Johnson [mailto:brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:18 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org;

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [sfc-dev] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Srikanth, We experienced a similar problem lately in OPNFV SFC when using multiple compute hosts. The situation was that the packets returning from an SF entered the SFF on the XVLAN-GPE port, and then the packets need to go to an SFF on a different compute host, and they do so on a normal

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise] CfP for OPNFV Summit

Dear Promiser's, As discussed in today's meeting, find an Etherpad for our discussion for Promise session(s) at the OPNFV Summit in Bejing in June: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/promise_opnfv_summit_2017 I have already proposed a first session on "Promise + Blazar", as well as a Breakout

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][dovetail] OpenStack HTTPS transport support in functest/dovetail

Hi folks, Let me clarify HTTPS support status and plan of functest/yardstick/dovetail. I tried to run functest/dovetail against TripleO deployment and find that functest script, leveraged by dovetail, only works with HTTP (!= HTTPS) for OpenStack API (see verify_connectivity():

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue

On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 13:41 +0200, Tapio Tallgren wrote: > > On 03/02/2017 10:45 AM, Marco Varlese >   wrote: > > > > >    > >    > >   Hi, > > > >   In my previous email I did not mention the use of the docker > > image, I was trying to install it on the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue

On 03/02/2017 10:45 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: Hi, In my previous email I did not mention the use of the docker image, I was trying to install it on the system following the online Yardstick documentation. Why do I need to use the docker image necessarily? I have been using a kvm VM for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue

Hi, In my previous email I did not mention the use of the docker image, I was trying to install it on the system following the online Yardstick documentation. Why do I need to use the docker image necessarily?  Also, are there any particular reasons/dependencies why it has to be Ubuntu 14.04?

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue

Hi Marco, What's the latest status of this issue? Does my solution be OK for you? I'm looking forward to your reply. Regards, Jack Chan From: chenjiankun Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:25 PM To: 'Marco Varlese' Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

Gabriel and Kubi made an update recently on 2 stress tests that should be defined/available/documented for Danube https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf?preview=/2926539/9568872/Stress%20Testing%20Update.pptx