[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] E-rlease content confirmation and mano over opnfv rationlaization planning

Meeting Details Meeting Times: Every Even Wednesday (7.00 am PST) at 15.00 UTC, Other Ad-hoc meeting as per Project requests For IRC can use can use http://webchat.freenode.net/ IRC#opnfv-mano (meetbot is set for meeting minutes ) GOTOMEETING: 1. Please join my meeting.(refer to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

I do want to step in to help explain what the issues are. The committers of dovetail project all wanted to both increase the talent pool and to broaden community representation. There is no disagreement on that goal. Different proposals were made in how to accomplish this - the majority agreed

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

I think 3 different issues are mixed here: (1) Issues at project execution - is there any evidenced misconduct there? From Chris "... I didn’t make that statement due to any unfairness that I feel should be raised, nor did I raise any, rather from difference of opinion as an explanation of why

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Thank You to the OPNFV Summit Track Chairs

The Track Chairs listed below did a great job helping us craft another high-quality program on a tight timeline for the OPNFV Summit. On behalf of OPNFV -- THANK YOU! NFV Applications and Orchestration - Balaji

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Chris's explanation makes complete sense to me (I have been involved in many of the recent CVP and Dovetail discussions). The points made about power, voting, hard feelings etc. miss the issue entirely ... unless we attract broad community representation with the appropriate competence for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Folks, For those that are unfamiliar when standing down as a committer one should follow this process: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Committer+Removal This requires an e-mail to the project, and addresses the PTL (Hongbo) for further action. My standing down was related to committer

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV Release Meeting @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Tuesday 22 times (PDT) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 TZNAME:PDT DTSTART:19700308T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV Release Meeting @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Tuesday 52 times (PDT) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 TZNAME:PDT DTSTART:19700308T02

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

In fairness to Chris, this was the #1 concern that came to me back at our November Plugfest, from numerous sources. I think Chris is actually the first to go on record as doing something about it. In his case, he has opted to resign as a committer. Honestly, I do not think it's the best resolution

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Bin, I wouldn't classify this as a "power struggle". I would rather say that there is a perception of lopsidedness in the governance. This was one of the things that came up at the November Plugfest. I really thought it would have been addressed by now. I guess I was wrong. Best, Ash On

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Dave, I don't think the issue is with having multiple committers from a single vendor. Committers should be committing or not be committers. My interpretation of Chris' email is that he doesn't seem to feel his voice is heard amongst the project governance. So I see that as a distinctly

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Infra][Pharos] About pharos wiki pages

That's fine! I am also interested in how ReadTheDocs can support for each project besides the normal release docs of OPNFV. Jack Morgan 于2017年4月27日周四 下午8:55写道： > Julien, > > We had some discussion about moving community labs documentation into > ReadTheDocs in the near

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Paul, Thanks for reaching out, and happy to try and answer your questions. In reference to my statement around “my voice counts for little”. I have raised since mid last-year the need to try to bring in a diversity of membership and to try and reimagine how the project has been operating

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Chris, I'm a complete outsider here, I have no familiarity with the Dovetail project and had to Google it to find out what it does. I also don't know what CVP is because it wasn't mentioned on the page I read about Dovetail. I mostly skim read the OPNFV mailing list or even delete without

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi, I put this to the TSC agenda for today. Personally, I agree with Bin about what the TSC could and should do about this, so I think we need to call for volunteers to help with the Dovetail project. -Tapio From: Christopher Price

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi, The Functest team is going to work on providing OpenID authentication to the TEST API and also the functionality of uploading a json file using the API with results to be pushed to the DB. We commit to have it ready 1-2 weeks before the OPNFV summit. We would like to implement this

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Bin, Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’d like to further understand the power struggle you clearly see here, I would be very interested to understand your views further. My views are quite clear that dovetail should be established with the best competence we have available to judge

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv] OVSNFV (MS1)

Hi, OVSNFV intends to participate in the Euphrates release. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/OVSNFV+Release+Plan+for+OPNFV+Euphrates Thanks, Mark ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Thnaks Trevor I added some points that reflect the notes for the next test weekly meeting planned on the 4th of May: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf feel free to add additional points I will not be able to join this time, could you chair the meeting? /Morgan Le 28/04/2017 à

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenRetriever Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT