Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] meeting#59 Is OVP VNF Ready?

George Hope and wish  you are doing well. Glad you noticed and responded to OVP question on VNF testing. This is a good info and like to follow up on the next mano-wg call with Amdocs team. Sure I will try attend the session at ONS besides seek to follow on with Chris  Donley and possibly Helen

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Step down as a committer

Hi TSC It was a wonderful experience working for this dovetail project , Yet my focus shift to other area, i will step down as a committer. -- 王磊 Leo M: +86-18930628020(上海号码)/+46-725281355(瑞典号码) E: leowang.wang...@huawei.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs and ONAP setup for Kubernetes and Arm pod at UNH

Maybe this may interest you. It's not specific to ARM, but CONTAINER4NFV project is working on a Clearwater implementation with K8s[0] and Helm[1]. Helm deployment will be Istio compatible. I wrote some documentation about it [2]. Best Regards, Sofia [0]: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/50467

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][fraser] MS5 - scenario integration - March 02

Gentle reminder... 2 weeks!! On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 4:56 PM, David McBride wrote: > ... also, please make sure that any scenarios that you plan to use are > accurately documented on the scenario status page > . Thanks. > > On Thu, Feb

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs and ONAP setup for Kubernetes and Arm pod at UNH

Not specific to ARM, but I have implemented clearwater-docker as part of the Models kubernetes demo deploy, which includes a full-stack k8s cluster deployment, ending with clearwater-docker deployment and test. See https://github.com/opnfv/models/tree/master/tools/kubernetes for an overview of

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs and ONAP setup for Kubernetes and Arm pod at UNH

Hello, Does anyone have pointers to open-source (containerized) VNFs for Kubernetes ? (something like this: http://dougbtv.com/nfvpe/2017/05/30/vnf-asterisk-kubernetes/, thanks Joe Kidder for sharing the link!) Even more specifically, Arm-compatible VNFs ? And which would be a recommended ONAP

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] For the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday

Re “As for the mailing list/IRC contributions, the difficulty comes with identity mapping. Trying to map IRC NICs/or email addresses with IDs used for the other tools is very challenging and will involve a lot of manual process.” Anyone that wants their identity to be mapped (e.g. to strengthen

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] For the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday

As promised, here's a new spreadsheet with updated wiki contributor data. Now the data should show beyond top 50 contributors and list anyone who contributed to the wiki in 2017. Bitergia also fixed a bug they had as there were some undercounting of "page edits". Thanks, Ray On Wed, Feb 14, 20

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] {releng-anteater] project_scan.py check for top-level license needs enhancements

Thanks, I'll take a look. On 16 Feb 2018 5:45 pm, "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" < bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote: > I’m not sure how/where to raise this as a bug, so I created a JIRA issue: > https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/RELENG-346 > > > > Anteater needs to verify that the project top-le

[opnfv-tech-discuss] {releng-anteater] project_scan.py check for top-level license needs enhancements

I'm not sure how/where to raise this as a bug, so I created a JIRA issue: https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/RELENG-346 Anteater needs to verify that the project top-level license file is correctly formatted ("Licence string present"), and accept any variation of file name "LICENSE*" (e.g. LICENSE.t

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Meeting 02/13/18

* - Should Barometer Graduate? (https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle )- Are we a part of enough scenarios (another installer)?- Would be a good recognition of the work done by Bar