[opnfv-tech-discuss] [APEX] Apex virtual deployment install fails with error

Hi I am trying to setup APEX virtual deployment on a centos7 VM by following the instructions from http://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-danube/submodules/apex/docs/release/installation/virtualinstall.html. At a high level: 1. Created a VM with Centos 7 on an ubuntu server 2. Installed RDO RPM

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [APEX] Apex virtual deployment install fails with error

Pan [mailto:f...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:29 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [APEX] Apex virtual deployment install fails with error Hi Srikanth, The failure you see is caused by a syntax error in ovs-dpdk

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Hi When I run the `sdnvpn' dovetail test cases, I see the below error for each run. I have ensured that the ubuntu cloudimg is present under $(DOVETAIL_HOME)/pre_config folder on the host before executing these tests. The failure is happening when the dovetail container is trying to copy the fi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

the dovetail container. Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:29 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Srikanth

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

by the given scenario 'bgpvpn'. 2017-07-03 19:03:53,275 - functest.ci.run_tests - DEBUG - Available tiers are: Thanks for your help… Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 9:17 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

, Srikanth Vavilapalli mailto:srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Thanks Dan Xu After fixing the DOVETAIL_HOME issue, I see the below WARNING logs in functest log, when I ran `dovetail run --testsuite proposed_tests --testarea sdnvpn`. Can I ignore these warning messages? I tried

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Thanks Dan Xu. I pulled cvp.0.2.0 version of dovetail and was able to verify the bgpvpn tests with this version. Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 12:51 AM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Jose Lausuch

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

of my colleague with sdnvpn scenario loaded. Thanks Srikanth From: Tianhongbo [mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 5:52 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; xudan (N) ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

71a70f-aa8a-44a7-83b9-f59705000483", "runner": {"duration": 1, "object": "yardstick.benchmark.scenarios.availability.serviceha.ServiceHA", "type": "Duration", "output_filename": "/home/opnfv/yardstick/results/dovetail.ha.tc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

: Thursday, July 06, 2017 11:55 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Srikanth, 1. About the pod.yaml file 1. Think it’s wrong. Switch to user “stack” first, then

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

Hi In tomorrow's weekly call, Tim and myself (from Ericsson) wanted to share our findings on test gaps in basic cloud capability, security and High availability areas. Can you plz add to the agenda if we can get some time for this? Thanks Srikanth ___

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

Hi Attached the slide deck… Thanks Srikanth From: Zenghui Shi [mailto:z...@redhat.com] Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 7:31 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: Wenjing Chu ; Tianhongbo ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow&#

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Installing and Running Functest in Transparent Proxy with Whitelists environment

Hi I am looking for some information in bringing up OPNFV Functest in a corporate proxy environment, where the proxy provides restricted internet connectivity based on the configured whitelist URLs. I have looked at the Functest documentation wiki links [1] and [2], but they are not covering t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Installing and Running Functest in Transparent Proxy with Whitelists environment

: wangwulin [mailto:wangwu...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:46 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Installing and Running Functest in Transparent Proxy with Whitelists environment Hi Srikanth, I am

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

Hi I am looking into Jira ticket "SDNVPN-181: Function "gather_logs" restricts to Apex and Fuel", which raises concerns on having installer dependent logic in the sdnvpn repo. The issue is, at the end of the sdnvpn test execution, we are invoking gathe

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM

Hi I am trying to run XCI inside a ubuntu 16.04 VM and in the mid-way the script stopped with the following error (The log is available at https://hastebin.com/maqepiwoyi.md). Can any one plz help me to resolve this issue? The environment I have is a vagrant VM with ubuntu 16.04 loaded. TASK [

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

com> On Oct 11, 2017, at 02:25, xudan (N) mailto:xuda...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Srikanth, As I know, some Yardstick test cases also need to login nodes. Yardstick uses a file providing all the login information. You can refer to https://github.com/opnfv/yardstick/tree/master

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM

@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Markos Chandras Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 12:38 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM On 11/10/17 23:17, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > Hi > >   > > I a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM

M To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM On 11/10/17 23:17, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > Hi > >   > > I am trying to run XCI inside a ubuntu 16.04 VM and in the mid-way the > script

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

Thanks Rex for the clarification. From: limingjiang [mailto:limingji...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 6:24 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Jose Lausuch ; Georg Kunz Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM

.de] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 1:17 AM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] xci - aio installation failed on a ubuntu 16.04 VM On 12/10/17 19:33, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > Hi Markos > > The following is the error I g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

believe these logs are more for debugging purposes rather than for end user consumption, but I may be wrong here. Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 6:50 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

f limingjiang Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools H

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

installer types. Plz let me know any comments or inputs… Thanks Srikanth From: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jalaus...@suse.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:18 AM To: David McBride ; Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: Tim Irnich ; Tim Rozet ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

That’s good to know… Thanks Peri for the fix. From: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jalaus...@suse.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 10:40 AM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: David McBride ; Tim Irnich ; Tim Rozet ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [availability]High Availability Project meeting on Oct. 18

7;Fan Yamei' ; 'Tony Yin' <14_...@tongji.edu.cn>; 'lansizhong' ; 'wucaifu' ; 'likaiyjy' ; 'wangxuyjy' ; Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: 'juan_qiu' ; 'Yue Yuan' ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss' Subject: RE: 答复: [opnfv-tech-di

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [availability]High Availability Project meeting on Oct. 18

Thanks Kubi. Yes, we can discuss this further in this week’s HA meeting (Nov-1st). Thanks Srikanth From: Georg Kunz Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 12:29 PM To: Gaoliang (kubi) ; Srikanth Vavilapalli Cc: 'juan_qiu' ; 'Yue Yuan' ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss' ; Fu Q

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Anyone working with Clearwater-docker ?

Hi Brian I also observed the same issue while building Ellis docker image: Step 4/12 : RUN /etc/init.d/mysql start && apt-get update && DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y --force-yes ellis ---> Running in ec6a9983baae * Starting MySQL database server mysqld ...fail! The command