Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] Labelling your Colorado repo for the release.

Done for Promise On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:40 AM Tahhan, Maryam wrote: > Done for SFQM and vswitchperf > > > > *From:* opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: > opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *David McBride > *Sent:* Wednesday,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] Labelling your Colorado repo for the release.

Done for SFQM and vswitchperf From: opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of David McBride Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:26 PM To: Christopher Price Cc:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] Labelling your Colorado repo for the release.

I just got that final doc patch merged. The SFC project is now labeled for Colorado 1.0: $ git tag -am "colorado.1.0" colorado.1.0 $ git push origin colorado.1.0 Counting objects: 1, done. Writing objects: 100% (1/1), 169 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 1 (delta 0), reused 0

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] Labelling your Colorado repo for the release.

Chris, I understood that we had until Thursday to do the labeling. I have one minor release notes and scenario doc patch pending that should be merged shortly. Once its merged, I'll do the label. Regards, Brady On 21/09/16 19:25, David McBride wrote: Note that Aric just added some

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] Labelling your Colorado repo for the release.

Note that Aric just added some troubleshooting instructions at the bottom of the page that Chris just linked. Please follow those instructions if you are having difficulty. David On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Christopher Price < christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Project leads, >