Hi Alec,
Sounds good. We can talk about that during the meeting. Thanks for proposing it.
Jose
-Original Message-
From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:ahot...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 16:53 PM
To: Jose Lausuch
Cc: Morgan Richomme ; Mark Beierl
; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opn
Hi Jose,
I have moved this topic and added a sub-agenda to the July 27 test-wg weekly
meeting agenda
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting)
It is good that this issue has not caused any big problem yet for container
owners (likely because none of the artifac
Hi Alec,
The versioning is not an urgent matter and it is working well today. I agree
it is a topic to be discussed but maybe it is better to wait until everyone is
back from PTO as it will be difficult to align without the participation of the
people who are really involved.
- Jose -
> O
Jose,
You should start the discussion at the next infra wg meeting (I’ll be on PTO
whole of next week). I think if the issue can be raised and acknowledged it
will already be a good step.
I will just note that:
- this has to be a joint work by both infra and project teams
- perhaps we could use
Hi,
Is there time to discuss this during the next infra wg meeting on Monday?
Although the test projects are the main ones using docker containers, we are
talking about versioning here, which I believe is topic the Infra team should
address.
I also would like to add to the agenda:
- decisio
July/August is tricky with PTOs.
Perhaps we should start the discussion by email on this mailer and discuss
about it in 2 weeks at the test-wg meeting?
Do you guys usually use a text document reviewed with gerrit to
discuss/collaborate on a spec? Or any other method? Please let me know and I
ca
I will be in PTO too :)
Unfortunately the weekly meeting was today at 8 UTC (APAC slot)
we will use the slot of tomorrow to organize an ad-hoc meeting with
Bitergia on result vizualization
not sure we will have 15 minutes for another topic
It is maybe possible to organize an ad-hoc meeting on
Morgan,
Unfortunately, I won’t be able to attend next week (on PTO).
Can this be squeezed into tomorrow’s meeting (July 13)? We could shorten it and
follow up with a separate meeting or on email/IRC.
Thanks
Alec
On 7/12/17, 8:32 AM, "morgan.richo...@orange.com"
wrote:
topic added fo
topic added for the next meeting (20th of July)
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
Mark and Jose are already involved in several activities dealing with
docker.
Cedric has a good view on this topic.
/Morgan
On 12/07/2017 17:27, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrot
I’d like to add this topic to the next weekly meeting of the test-wg and would
like to know if anybody else from test-wg would be interested to help redact a
proposal for enhancing the docker container versioning and build workflow in
OPNFV. As I understand this will only concern a subset of te
+1 to "Can we work on a proposal and get every project that deals with
containers involved?"
It is mainly test projects who use containers so I again let testing community
to take the lead and point you to where/how the conversation started.
We can then try to generalize it later on.
/Fatih
O
Hi Fatih,
From: Fatih Degirmenci
Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 2:04 PM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Beierl, Mark"
Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" ,
"test...@lists.opnfv.org"
Subject: Re: [test-wg] docker container versioning
Hi Alec,
Your understanding about the docker image ta
yardstick danube.3.0 was a mistaken premature tag before the release was
postponed, we can't delete git tags, so new git tag will be danube.3.1 with
docker tag danube.3.1
docker danube.3.0 image was custom build for Dovetail. We have projects
consuming other project's dockers, so there are d
Hi Alec,
Your understanding about the docker image tags seem correct to me (latest vs
stable) but I let someone from test projects answer to that.
When it comes to artifact versioning in general; you are asking really good
questions. Let me go back in time and summarize what plans we had (ie wh
[ cc test-wg - was [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one
project) ]
Hi Fatih
It is generally not easy to deal with container tags that do not include any
information that links easily to a git repo commit (e.g. a “version” number
increased by 1 for each build does not tell
15 matches
Mail list logo
