I support fewer distinct channels also. If it turns out we have an adhoc
meeting conflict, we can setup #opnfv-alt1/2/3 ala OpenStack, ping others and
move conversations there as needed. Just like CB radio.
On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Chris.
There is also
Hi,
I agree with Chris.
There is also a very well suited channel for general discussion, not
limited to Dovetail, #opnfv - I propose we use that if there are topics
that need real-time interaction. Also, please remember the old Apache
dictum: "If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't ha
Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting.
Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 days
ago?
(Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather they
work on community channels as separate channels are at times not very
Hi Chris:
Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting.
But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all
time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick.
If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that.
That is the problem.
Best Regards
hongbo
发件人: Christopher Price [m
