ci
<fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>; jack.mor...@intel.com; Christopher Price
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>; Ray Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>;
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions
On the "Requirements
I'm pretty open-- certainly more so than I was in 2014
Back then, I created a flow chart that started with the whole approach to a
new project being created and out of that whole process, only one item is
still in the current process-- the need to reference a particular NFV
standard that is
Hi,
On 09/20/2016 12:57 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Several weeks ago as part of the inclusion of Requirements Projects, I
> asked how we know that people are looking at what we are producing in
> Requirements projects and how we (OPNFV) ensure that deliverables from
> Requirements projects are
her Price
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>; Heather Kirksey
(hkirk...@linuxfoundation.org) <hkirk...@linuxfoundation.org>; Ray Paik
<rp...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions
Hello TSC Membrs
Several weeks ago as part of the inclusion of Requirements Projects, I asked
how we know that people are looking at what we are producing in Requirements
projects and how we (OPNFV) ensure that deliverables from Requirements projects
are being reviewed and taken into account
