lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results
I don’t think Yardstick tests are being interpreted much today, at least not as
performance metrics. To reach a level of maturity that would make
interpretation easy/useful and help the industry, IMO we need
S at Cisco); Gaoliang (kubi); limingjiang
Cc: Andrej Vanko -X (avanko - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results
I don't think Yardstick tests are being interpreted much today, at least not as
performan
m>
Cc: Andrej Vanko -X (avanko - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
<ava...@cisco.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Interpretation of yardstick test results
Hi,
I think the question was already asked in Brahmaputra :)
We got an update on grafana last w
Hi,
I think the question was already asked in Brahmaputra :)
We got an update on grafana last week but it was more on the
capabilities of the tools than on the interpretation of the results.
I think we should clearly have a discussion on this topic.
It is probably complex to define thresholds =
