Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Good morning Manuel! It looks good, here is my output: lab232@lab232-G31M-ES2C:~$ curl -u admin:admin -H 'Content-type: application/json' -X GET http://192.168.0.9:8282/controller/nb/v2/neutron/networks { "networks" : [ { "id" : "fb38dc83-fc4a-453a-babf-2c09e2b7f6de",

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Is your ODL listening on: 192.168.0.9:8282? Give me the output of: curl -u admin:admin -H 'Content-type: application/json' -X GET http://1 92.168.0.9:8282/controller/nb/v2/neutron/networks Regards, Manuel On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 14:06 +0200, andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu wrote: >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Manuel, I am deploying using fuel and ODL plug-in. You will find both files in the attachement. Regards, Quoting "Manuel Buil" : Hi, I just checked your logs. It seems the ml2_conf.ini file is wrong. Are you deploying openstack using fuel and ODL plug-in? Can you post:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Manuel, Following is the output of the cvs-ofctl command. OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.3) (xid=0x2): cookie=0x1110010002420255, duration=62656.965s, table=11, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, tcp, reg0=0x1, tp_dst=80 actions=move:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31]->NXM_NX_NSH_C2[], push_nsh,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi, I just checked your logs. It seems the ml2_conf.ini file is wrong. Are you deploying openstack using fuel and ODL plug-in? Can you post: /etc/neutron/neutron.conf /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini They are in the controller Regards, Manuel On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 12:34 +0200,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

HEllo Andres, YEs, it is fine to post this in IRC. I will try to run the tests this afternoon in our fuel POD to see if I can reproduce them. Regards, Manuel On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 12:34 +0200, andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu wrote: > Good morning to both! > > Manuel let me know if it is

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Pavan, n_packets=0 means that no packets are matching the conditions. Is this the switch where the client that generates the traffic is connected to? Regards, Manuel On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 12:44 +0530, Pavan Gupta wrote: > Hi Manuel,Following is the output of the cvs-ofctl command.  > >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

HI Pavan, Seems like it is not blocking. Can you check that your packets are being classified at all? Look into table=11 of the compute: ovs-ofctl -O Openflow13 dump-flows br-int table=11 Regards, Manuel On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 17:54 +0530, Pavan Gupta wrote: > > > > Hi Andres/Manuel,I could run

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Andres/Manuel, I could run the test cases to completion, however, each one passed partially. I am not sure if the error msgs from neutron log point to subset failure of each test case. Let me know if you have any further pointers. Pavan SFC.log 2017-07-19 11:33:49,911 - __main__ - INFO -

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hello Pavan, I encountered similar errors in my SFC log, my script also gave an error when waiting the instance to come up but i have not been able to resolve it. Looking into your logs I think the problem is in Neutron so you should probably check Neutron logs, and also validate that you

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Andres, I ran ‘functest openstack clean’ and that tool care of ‘SFC already exist’ error. The test ran further till it hit the following issue. In case, you have come across this issue, let me know. SFC.log 2017-07-18 08:45:38,445 - ovs_logger - ERROR - list index out of range 2017-07-18

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Pavan, I have not encountered those errors! It looks like there is already and SFC classifier already declared, but i thought that if you run the functest script it deleted anything that was previously declared. Maybe Manuel has any idea, i am still working on my scenario trying to set

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

HI Andres, Thanks to your inputs, the test moved forward, though it failed. Here’s the log snippe. Let me know if you know how to fix this issue: 2017-07-17 12:24:16,434 - tacker_utils - ERROR - error [create_sfc(tacker_client, 'red', 'None', '['testVNF1', 'testVNF2']')]: SFC with name red

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hello Pavan, I encountered a similar problem in my setting, it appears that the problem is that the configuration file is not updated with your installer IP address. So what i did was: edit the file "/home/opnfv/repos/sfc/sfc/tests/functest/config.yaml" and modify the installer IP

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

HI Andres, I now hit issue related to 10.20.0.2 IP address. Though at time of starting the container I gave a different IP address, I see there are several files that have 10.20.0.2 IP address. Shouldn’t that change? This is where my script fails: root@c8fc69ea9256:~# cat

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Ok. Not sure Manuel how to get tacker file. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? I am quite new to openstack in general. Pavan > On 14-Jul-2017, at 7:35 PM, Manuel Buil wrote: > > tackerc file not found, fetching it from controller

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

p, 0.0.0.0:8090->8089/tcp autolytiks_influxdb_1 >>>> 6e77fd10b6c8postgres:latest "docker-entrypoint..." 2 >>>> months agoUp 8 days 0.0.0.0:5432->5432/tcp >>>> autolytiks_p

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

.@ericsson.com >>> <mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Pavan, >>> >>> I don’t see any attachment. >>> >>> | 2. Docker image: Docker version 17.04.0-ce, build 4845c56 >>> I meant the Functest docker i

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Jose, 1. I have attached functest.log. 2. Docker image: Docker version 17.04.0-ce, build 4845c56 3. Installer: Fuel, version 10.0.0 4. Credentials: Same as mentioned in the link (root, r00tme) Thank you. Pavan > On 14-Jul-2017, at 5:15 PM, Jose Lausuch wrote: >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

gt;>>> /home/opnfv/functest/conf/openstack.creds >>>>> >>>>> Let me know if it still fails that way. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jose >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: opnfv-te

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

ailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Pavan >>> Gupta >>> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 14:29 PM >>> To: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com <mailto:mb...@suse.com>> >>> Cc: andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu >>>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Jose, - I run the docker within Jumphost machine. - I have put the following content in openstack.creds file: OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne OS_DEFAULT_DOMAIN=default OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME=Default OS_PROJECT_NAME=admin OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 OS_PASSWORD=admin OS_AUTH_STRATEGY=keystone

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

9 PM > To: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com> > Cc: andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu; OPNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV > <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project > > Hi Manuel/Andres, > When I run 'functest env pr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

nfv/functest:stable    > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "/bin/bash"              6 hours ago         Up 6 hours                           > > > > >                                                          sfc > > > >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

          8000/tcp                                                               > > >    autolytiks_web_1 > > > > > > > > > > > > f7e290be942d        influxdb:latest          "/entrypoint.sh in..."   2 months ago        Up 8 days           0.0.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

diant.upc.edu>; OPNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project Hi Jose, 1. I have attached functest.log. 2. Docker image: Docker version 17.04.0-ce, build 4845c56 3. Installe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

14, 2017 14:28 PM To: Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> Cc: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com>; andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu; OPNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project Hi Jose, 1. I have attached functe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

PNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project Hi Manuel/Andres, When I run 'functest env prepare’, I also see this issue: /home/opnfv/repos/releng/utils/fetch_os_creds.sh: line 76:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

t; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In that case, you need to provide the openstack RC file > > > > > > > > > > > > from your deployment manually to the container, or just copy the content to  /home/opnfv/functest/conf/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Thursday, July 13, 2017 14:29 PM To: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com<mailto:mb...@suse.com>> Cc: andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu<mailto:andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu>; OPNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project Hi Manuel/Andres, When I run 'functest env prepare’, I also see this issue: /home/opnfv/repos/releng/utils/fetch_os_creds.sh: line 76: SALT_MASTER_IP: unbound variable What should be SALT_MASTER_IP address?

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hello Manuel | Pavan, The error where 10.20.0.2 occurs afterwards (when executing functest testcase run odl-sfc), for what I can see this is ocurring at executing "functest env prepare". If I understand correctly this error is indicating that the machine where you are executing the test

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Manuel/Andres, When I run 'functest env prepare’, I also see this issue: /home/opnfv/repos/releng/utils/fetch_os_creds.sh: line 76: SALT_MASTER_IP: unbound variable What should be SALT_MASTER_IP address? Pavan > On 13-Jul-2017, at 3:37 PM, Manuel Buil wrote: > > 10.20.0.2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Andres, can you explain Pavan what you did to solve your issue? I think he is also hitting the error you found that 10.20.0.2 is hardcoded. Thanks, Manuel On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:28 +0530, Pavan Gupta wrote: > > Ok. Any idea what needs to be done. I am trying things at my side.Pavan > > > > >