Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

2017-06-19 Thread 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J
Hi, they actually should use the extender constants, but also the new HttpWhiteboardConstants :) regards, Achim 2017-06-20 2:22 GMT+02:00 Eben Stewart : > ok, correct me if I am wrong > > in HttpContextTracker (org.ops4j.pax.web.extender. > whiteboard.internal.tracker) > > HttpContextElemen

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

2017-06-19 Thread Eben Stewart
ok, correct me if I am wrong in HttpContextTracker (org.ops4j.pax.web.extender.whiteboard.internal.tracker) HttpContextElement createHttpContextElement(final ServiceReference serviceReference, final HttpContext published) { String httpContextId = ServicePropertiesUtils.getStringProperty(s

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

2017-06-19 Thread Eben Stewart
Sounds good... knowing the history, and the future dev plans, especially if they make it into the OSGI spec, is always good :D I'm taking from your comments that the ExtenderConstants are not long term? It would be better to have an HttpWhiteboardConstants way of doing it? I think all the anno

[pax=jdbc-1.1.0] 65k DB connections with pool of 25.

2017-06-19 Thread Dutch Dude
All - I have been struggling with DB connection errors with PAX-JDBC for a while now, and I couldn't really get my mind around it. Just today I noticed something really bizar. On a Windows Server, PAX-JDBC (sometimes) ends up in a loop creating DB connections until the OS runs out of resources

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

2017-06-19 Thread 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J
Hi, thanks for the sample, will see to it. regarding the comments/remarks, see my comments inline :) Achim 2017-06-19 14:50 GMT+02:00 Eben Stewart : > Attached is a working example, the smallest I could get it (project is > bndtools under Eclipse) > > A few points that threw me off, that did no

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

2017-06-19 Thread nino martinez wael
Ahh I see most of the changes where from 6.x to 7.x.. But what about the Websocket stuff, as I remember it has been changed alot in Wicket 8..? On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:55 PM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I opened a bug to Wicket 8: https://issues.apache.org

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

2017-06-19 Thread 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
I opened a bug to Wicket 8: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6402 it seems they lost the OSGi Manifest information in Wicket 8 what is bad. Beside thsi there seem no API changes that influence Pax-Wicket so once Wicket 8 is release we can raise the version range instead of supply a

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

2017-06-19 Thread Eben Stewart
Attached is a working example, the smallest I could get it (project is bndtools under Eclipse) A few points that threw me off, that did not seem clear at first (although they make sense now) - a lot of it had to do with the whiteboard extensions to get resources and jsp support - I am not aware

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 7)

2017-06-19 Thread 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
Hi Nino, I created the branch v3.1.x, it is working so far beside the karaf tests fail with Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for URL: http://localhost:8181/issues any idea what is causing this? If we have sorted this out I think we should make this the 4.0 version and make wicket 8

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

2017-06-19 Thread nino martinez wael
Ok great, let me know If I can do something.. On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:40 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Nino, > > I'm currently trying to upgrade the master from Wicket 6-->7 to see what > have changed and will then go on to 7-->8 I think this might br

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

2017-06-19 Thread 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
Hi Nino, I'm currently trying to upgrade the master from Wicket 6-->7 to see what have changed and will then go on to 7-->8 I think this might bring some light into this issue. Am 22.05.2017 06:55, schrieb nino martinez wael: Hi Over 2 months ago I made the last changes to the 4.x.y branch[

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

2017-06-19 Thread 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
Found the issue: The logmessage simply has wrong parameter order and a missleading logger name, beside this this has no impact on the code since we scan the classpath for pax-wicket annotations The real cause for the waring is: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12142872/java-lang-classformat