Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Pax Exam 5.0.0

> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:16 AM Arnoud Glimmerveen >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> As a Pax Exam user I would love to see this release become available! :) >&g

Re: Moving documentation to Git

Awesome ! Thanks ! Regards JB On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:48 PM Oliver Lietz wrote: > > Hi *, > > We discussed in 2020 to switch over from Confluence and Jira to GitHub Pages > and Issues. > Migration of issues to GitHub was done by Grzegorz a while back. > I will now start working on

Re: PaxWeb 7.2.29 - Jetty upgrade?

Hi Richard, Both releases are planned for next week on my TODO. I was busy with ActiveMQ release, now on vote, so I will be back on Karaf this week end. Regards JB On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 1:42 PM 'Richard Hierlmeier' via OPS4J wrote: > > Do you have a release schedule for PAX-WEB 7.2.x and

Fwd: PaxWeb 7.2.29 - Jetty upgrade?

By the way, I just checked, and as I thought, it's already done for Jetty 9.4.48 upgrade on Pax Web 7.3.x: https://github.com/apache/karaf/commit/62ebc20609 Regarding upgrade on Pax Web 7.2.x, Karaf 4.2.x is not active anymore, so I invite you to upgrade to Karaf 4.3.x. Regards JB On Thu, Aug

Fwd: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

> > not in favor of moving the pax projects anywhere. > > > > Again sorry if I'm PITA. > > > > regards, Achim > > > > > > > > Am Do., 24. Feb. 2022 um 22:44 Uhr schrieb Eric Lilja >> : > > > >> Personally, I would love to se

Fwd: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

gt; under an apache umbrella. > > thanks, Achim > > Am Do., 24. Feb. 2022 um 15:04 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré > : >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Some of you already pinged me to share concerns about PAX projects >> governance. I think it's my duty to share

Fwd: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

Hi guys, Some of you already pinged me to share concerns about PAX projects governance. I think it's my duty to share these concerns and discuss possible actions. Apache Karaf is one of the biggest consumers of PAX projects. However, PAX projects use a "self own" designed governance: - for

Re: [PAXEXAM] Cannot build project org.ops4j.pax.exam2, cannot resolve org.ops4j.pax.swissbox:pax-swissbox-core:jar:1.8.4-SNAPSHOT

Hi I did swissbox 1.8.4 release already, so, we can upgrade pax exam to this version. Regards JB > Le 26 mai 2021 à 22:20, Васил Зорев a écrit : > > Changing the swissbox dependency version from 1.8.4-SNAPSHOT to 1.8.4 works. > It's good enough for me for local tests. Let me know if it

Re: [PAXEXAM] Cannot build project org.ops4j.pax.exam2, cannot resolve org.ops4j.pax.swissbox:pax-swissbox-core:jar:1.8.4-SNAPSHOT

Hi, I did the swissbox 1.8.4 release already, so we can upgrade to this version in Pax Exam. Regards JB On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:20 PM Васил Зорев wrote: > Changing the swissbox dependency version from 1.8.4-SNAPSHOT to 1.8.4 > works. It's good enough for me for local tests. Let me know if

Re: [PAXEXAM] Cannot build project org.ops4j.pax.exam2, cannot resolve org.ops4j.pax.swissbox:pax-swissbox-core:jar:1.8.4-SNAPSHOT

Hi, ops4j snapshot repository doesn't exist anymore. You have to build SNAPSHOT locally (at least for ops4j projects). Regards JB On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:58 PM Васил Зорев wrote: > Seems I cannot access the repository at all. > > [image: Capture.PNG] > Is it only available to committers? >

Re: upgrade to Jetty 9.4.39.v20210325

t back" OSGi metadata since 2.2.5.Final >> (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1852 >> <https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1852>) >> >> Karaf 4.3.x chose pax-web-7.3.x despite it's still not proper OSGi CMPN 7 >> implementation (the goal is to h

Re: upgrade to Jetty 9.4.39.v20210325

spite it's still not proper OSGi CMPN 7 > implementation (the goal is to have Pax Web 8 compliant to OSGi CMPN 7 > specification, but it reaally required lots of fundamental changes, I > was describing for at least a year). > > I hope this clarifies the state of Pax Web. > &

Re: upgrade to Jetty 9.4.39.v20210325

Hi, It’s already plan and I have Pax Web releases on the way, including this and other fixes. So, don’t worry, we will have the Pax Web releases tomorrow. Regards JB > Le 12 avr. 2021 à 18:25, 'Fabien S' via OPS4J a > écrit : > > I created this issue about the upgrade to Jetty

Re: [PAX WEB] Default branch name change

+1 Thanks for tackling this. Regards JB > Le 9 avr. 2021 à 12:26, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > > Hello > > I just wanted to write that I've changed the default branch in > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web > project. > According to new

Re: [PAX-WEB] Warning "failed to parse and instantiate of javax.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer in classpath"

Hi, I would check the TCCL and the import. It’s hard to say without knowing the weaving. Regards JB > Le 13 févr. 2021 à 16:18, Alain Picard a > écrit : > > Bonjour Jean-Baptiste, > > This is not running under Karaf, just running as a standard PDE OSGi project > and it is using Pax Web

Re: [PAX-WEB] Warning "failed to parse and instantiate of javax.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer in classpath"

Hi Alain, Are you using Karaf or you are running it on your own ? That would be great if you describe a bit the environment, especially which Pax projects are you using (pax logging, pax web, …). Regards JB > Le 13 févr. 2021 à 14:48, Alain Picard a > écrit : > > I am getting a few hundred

Re: Migration from Jira to Github issues

Hi, It sounds good to me ! Thanks, Regards JB > Le 1 févr. 2021 à 09:38, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > > Hello > > Some time ago[1] we were discussing the idea whether to move to Github issues > and move away from Jira. The main reason was related to registration/spam > problems at cloud

Re: Cannot start Felix-Fileinstall in pax-container-forked

Hi Muza, Do you provide file install system properties in the test (felix.fileinstall.dir, etc) ? Regards JB > Le 8 déc. 2020 à 20:20, Muza a écrit : > > Hello. > > I was using pax-exam-container-forked, and having trouble starting > org.apache.felix.fileinstall bundle. The test-container

Re: Pax Web the discovery of the Servlet Initializers seems to be fundamentally flawed.

Hi, SpiFly can help, and you can always use direct war/webapp (not webbundle). Regards JB On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 6:56 PM 'paul stanley' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Grzegorz, > > Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. > > I realise your concerns about sci's from

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Pax Exam 5.0.0

take time to finalize/test this. >> >> Thanks, >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As we fixed several issues and did s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Pax Exam 5.0.0

Hi, just a quick update: I will cut Pax Exam 4.13.4 today. The purpose of Pax Exam 5.0.0 is also to upgrade to JUnit 5. So, I will take time to finalize/test this. Thanks, Regards JB On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,

[PROPOSAL] Release Pax Exam 5.0.0

Hi, As we fixed several issues and did some changes in Pax Exam master, I think it makes sense to cut Pax Exam 5.0.0. I have a couple of things to add but the release is almost ready. No objection ? Thanks, Regards JB -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org -

Re: [Pax-Web] Update Tomcat Versions

ill use latest Tomcat 9 and get rid of tipi packages >>(Tomcat jars will be exported from pax-web-tomcat and >> pax-web-tomcat-common >>bundles (the latter is new)). >> >> regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> wt., 23 cze 2020 o 15:46 Jean-Baptiste

Re: [Pax-Web] Update Tomcat Versions

Hi, It sounds good. Tomcat 8.x should be easy, Tomcat 9 probably needs API updates. Regards JB On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:19 AM Stephan Siano wrote: > Hi, > > It has been quite a while since the Tomcat version was updated in Pax-Web. > The 7.2.x branch references Tomcat 8.5.32 and the 3.x and

Re: Pax exam test failing with gave up waiting for service org.ops4j.pax.exam.ProbeInvoker

Hi Christian, Don't you have anything in the log at bootstrap ? Most of the time, when I have this kind of problem, it's because there's something missing to actually start the framework. Regards JB On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 12:30 PM Christian Schneider wrote: > I have a pax exam test that fails

Re: Cannot start pax-web-jetty-bundle - Package uses conflict: Import-Package: org.ops4j.pax.web.service

Hi, If you take a look on the Jetty Karaf feature, you can see the javax.servlet is installed as bundle: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/pax-web-7.2.x/pax-web-features/src/main/resources/features.xml#L38 So you have to do the same. As Pax Web is "container" agnostic (meaning it

Re: Pax Logging loses track of loggers because of change made when you added generics in December 2015

-312 == > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2819 == CVE-2020-9488 soon. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > pon., 4 maj 2020 o 10:41 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > >> Hi Grzegorz, >> >> Pax Logging 1.11.x

Re: Pax Logging loses track of loggers because of change made when you added generics in December 2015

Hi Grzegorz, Pax Logging 1.11.x is not impacted ? Regards JB On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:40 AM Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello again > > Without waiting, I've just released pax-logging 1.10.6 version - I hope > it'll solve all your (Monica Ron) problems ;) > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > >

Re: Jira or github?

+1 to use github tools. Regards JB On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:15 AM 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi, > > in the past we needed to do a "lock-down" on self-registration for the > Jira Instance due to tremendous amount of spam in Jira Issues and on the > confluence

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Sporadic ServiceLookupException in JUnitProbeInvokerFactory.createProbeInvoker

Hi, yes, it makes sense. Let me know if you want to create the PR else I will do it. Thanks, Regards JB On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 8:34 AM Matteo Rulli wrote: > Hello, > > We are using Pax-Exam to run integration tests based on Apache Karaf. On > particularly heavy tests we experience sporadic

Re: Spring Cleanup of OPS4J

Hi Toni, Thanks for starting this. I will update the wiki page as well. Regards JB On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:42 PM Toni Menzel wrote: > Hey, > > With the Domain transitioning of the ops4j.org domain from Niclas to JB > and the official decommissioning of ci.ops4j.org Jenkins we are kicking >

Re: [VOTE] JB Onofre takes over ops4j domains

Hi, Just to let you know that domains transfer is now effective. Niclas and I have manage the transfer. Regards JB On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 8:45 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I think we have consensus, and I will initiate domain transfer off-list > with JB > > Thanks everyone for giving your

Re: [VOTE] Decommissioning of old jenkins instance ci.ops4j.org

+1 Regards JB Le ven. 3 avr. 2020 à 10:27, Toni Menzel a écrit : > Hey, > > For some years we had a jenkins CI instance running on a rented hetzner > server. > As mentioned before, this instance seems dysfunctional and not used > anymore. > > So I would like to vote for decommissioning that. >

Re: ops4j domain names

The full structure of community can in principle > be discussed/decided later, or not... > > > // Niclas > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I agree. >> >> What do you think I start a vot

Re: ops4j domain names

look into making it a proper foundation or at least an >>>entity that makes the work here eligible for future donations. I am not >>>sure of this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance. >>>- Retire non active projects and donate active projects

Re: ops4j domain names

ategic Software Delivery Consultant @ rebaze GmbH* > Consultant profiletonimenzel.com <https://www.tonimenzel.com> > Consultancy profile rebaze.com <https://www.rebaze.com> > *#CloudNative #Accelerate #DevEx* > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:49 AM Jean-Baptiste On

Re: ops4j domain names

is is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance. >>- Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache. >>Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property) >> >> wdyt? >> Toni >> >> >> >> >> *Toni Menz

Re: Will ServletContext OSGi service injections be available in the OSGi 7 compatible web whiteboard

Hi AFAIR, those properties are already supported in Pax Web. Regards JB On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Steinar Bang wrote: > > Grzegorz Grzybek >: > > >> Will it be possible to get a ServletContext OSGi service injected into a > >> @Reference, when using the web whiteboard of OSGi 7? >

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.3

Hi, No problem, I will tackle that. Regards JB On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:46 PM Eric Lilja wrote: > That would be awesome to get a release out if we have fix for PAXEXAM-920! > > JB: Do you have the possibility to get this release out? > > - Eric L > > On Friday, March 13, 2020 at 9:46:11 AM

Re: Maven Aether configuration

is? > > I am really quite a novice at Pax Exam stuff. > > cheers, > jared > > On 2020-03-05 1:32 p.m., Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Why not simply update the pax url cfg file in the pax exam config ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > L

Re: Maven Aether configuration

Why not simply update the pax url cfg file in the pax exam config ? Regards JB Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 à 20:01, Jared Whiklo a écrit : > Thank you Grzegorz, > > Here is the test currently > > >

Re: Maven Aether configuration

Hi Sorry I jump late on this thread. I don’t have any problem in Karaf (we have bunch of tests running daily without problem). I guess you are on Windows platform right ? Which jdk version ? Anything special about network (like a proxy to access Internet) ? Regards JB Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

Hi Yes the announcement with change log will be made here. I’m preparing this. Stay tuned ! Regards JB Le sam. 22 févr. 2020 à 20:43, Eric Lilja a écrit : > > > On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 8:32:40 AM UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >&g

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

Hi, Pax Exam 4.13.2 has been released. I'm preparing the news on OPS4J site and I will send the announcement email. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:11 PM Oliver Lietz wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Sure. I will. > >

Re: Upgrade Jetty Dependency to 9.4.24 or newer.

Hi Yes I’m upgrading to jetty 9.4.26 in pax web 7.2 and 7.3. I just have to fix a package change about jaspi. It should be done today. Regards JB Le jeu. 20 févr. 2020 à 09:10, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > Jean-Baptiste - I saw you're upgrading Jetty in pax-web. Will you do it in

Re: ops4j domain names

ping JIRA in > favour of github issues (they improved the issue/project handling a lot) > to centralize development to one place. > > Github even offers building "Actions" now so maybe this is also an > alternative for custom build-server. > > Am 20.02.20 um 07:17 schrieb Je

Re: ops4j domain names

this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance. >- Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache. >Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property) > > wdyt? > Toni > > > > > *Toni Menzel | rebaze.com <https://www.rebaze.com>

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

Thanks for the update. I will proceed then. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:11 PM Oliver Lietz wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Sure. I will. > > Done. PAXEXAM-934 and dependency updates (fixing HTTP issue with

Re: ops4j domain names

ture donations. I am not sure of >this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance. >- Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache. >Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property) > > wdyt? > Toni > > > > &

Re: ops4j domain names

Hi Niclas First of all, thanks a lot for all what you did (and still doing ). I’m ready to take the hand for the domain and finance them. Thoughts ? Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 12:13, Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > Everyone, > In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

Sure. I will. Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 11:23, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi > > > > I will. > > Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the > release. Can

Re: Using GitHub Issues and Pages

Hi To be honest I prefer jira over GitHub issue. However, regarding the use we do of Jira, GitHub issues could be an alternative. Quite the same about Confluence. So, I'm +0 about that, let's wait what the others are thinking about that. Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:43, Oliver Lietz

Re: [PAX EXAM] 5 – status?

Hi I will populate jira for the roadmap. Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:31, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 9:04:20 PM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi > > > > Yes. After discussed with Romain we identified several improvements

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

Hi I will. Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:35, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > Hi *, > > I need a new release of Pax Exam: 4.13.2 > Who can manage versions in JIRA? > > Thanks, > O. > > > > > -- > -- > -- > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com > > --- > You

Re: [PAX EXAM] 5 – status?

Hi Yes. After discussed with Romain we identified several improvements. We plan to work on this starting from next week. I would like to release pax exam 5 in couple of weeks. Regards JB Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 19:53, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > Hi *, > > What is the status of Pax Exam 5? >

Re: [PAX WEB] Url Pattern is auto-generated from Alias and how to register exact url pattern

implementation, but can be miss-used as I've demonstrated. > > Kind Regards, > Miroslav > > > V V ned., 16. feb. 2020 ob 12:51 je oseba 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J < > ops4j@googlegroups.com> napisala: > >> Agree >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb am Sa. 15.

Re: [PAX WEB] Url Pattern is auto-generated from Alias and how to register exact url pattern

uot;/alias" should > *always* be changed to "/alias/*" to comply with specification. > > If you want to do exact matching, just use the methods accepting URL > parameters. > > +Achim Nierbeck , +Jean-Baptiste Onofré > do you agree? > > regards > Grzegorz G

Re: [Pax Web] Model change in R7

Hi Grzegorz Thanks a lot for your detailed email ! That's a great update and you are faster than I (I'm sorry I'm late on Pax Web :/ ). I will ping you on Slack asap to see how I can help. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:07 PM Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > A quick summary of my

Re: [PAX WEB] Url Pattern is auto-generated from Alias and how to register exact url pattern

Hi Can you please share how you register the servlet ? Via the httpService.register, Servlet service registration or whiteboard ? Thanks, Regards JB On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:14 PM Miroslav Beranič < miroslav.bera...@mibesis.si> wrote: > Hi all, > > I work with Pax Web on Karaf 4.3.0. I am

Re: [PAX WEB] Url Pattern is auto-generated from Alias and how to register exact url pattern

Hi Grzegorz, Let's sync together about action plan as I started some changes as well. Regards JB On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > Yes - this is all confusing... I'm just in the process of reviewing master > branch (pax web 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) to check R7 (and

Re: [PAX WEB] 10 ways (in one of several categories) to register a servlet

Hi, I think a cleanup is required. For Pax Web 8.x, I would simply go with removing the discussed items. Regards JB On 03/02/2020 11:54, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I'm reviewing the consistency, stability and user-friendliness of Pax > Web 8 and I tell myself that if now is not the

Re: [PAX-WEB] Interfaces, number of methods and miscellaneous information

Hi Grzegorz, I think we can improve some interfaces, especially WebContainer and Configuration. Jetty 10 is not an option yet to me as it requires Java 13. IMHO, it's a too large jump. I would rather stay with Jetty 9 and Servlet 3.1 for now. Regards JB On 27/01/2020 10:07, Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: State of Pax-Web integrationtests?

Hi Achim, If you checked on master, we are working on the R7 support, so we have some parts broken. The pax-web-7.2.x (used in Karaf) should be fine for itests. Regards JB On 11/01/2020 12:38, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: > Hi, > > as I wanted to take a look if the github project build is

Re: pax-logging 1.11.4 release?

Yeah agree. I can also tackle the release if needed. Regards JB Le jeu. 2 janv. 2020 à 17:26, Matt Pavlovich a écrit : > Grzegorz- > > I saw you just merged support for log4j2 2.13.0 into the 1.11.4 branch. > What are your thoughts on timing for a 1.11.4 release? A Karaf 4.2.8 is in > the

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

? (like Travis). regards, *François Papon* *papon...@gmail.com <mailto:papon...@gmail.com>* Le lun. 2 déc. 2019 à 11:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>> a écrit : Hi, Let me check. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 02/1

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

Hi, Let me check. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 02/12/2019 11:01, françois papon wrote: Hi, The https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ is not available. Is it normal? May be the repository have been moved? regards, * François* -- -- -- OPS4J -

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

Hi Dietrich, Yeah, it's a pretty old blog post ;) I think it makes sense to add or extend the Karaf examples. I will do it. Thanks, Regards JB On 30/11/2019 10:25, Dietrich Schulten wrote: > Exactly. Those spring and activemq versions were a bit painful indeed :) > > Btw your old blog code is

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

looks most promising. > I'll try to update my clone of your older tutorial accordingly. > > Best, > Dietrich > > > Am Freitag, 29. November 2019 10:02:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jean-Baptiste > Onofré: > > Hi, > > CamelTestSupport is for utest whereas pax-exam is mo

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

Hi, CamelTestSupport is for utest whereas pax-exam is more for itest. You can take a look on some itest I did about Camel, for instance: https://github.com/apache/karaf-decanter/pull/111/files#diff-f23addf50c34ea79c8df17bb2861d649 So, you should *NOT* use CamelTestSupport for itest (and keep

Re: Pax Runner Issue with Java11

Hi Rome, For Pax Runner you are right (I don't have the issue in Pax Exam as we are using Karaf). I will create the Jira and fix that. Regards JB On 01/11/2019 19:39, Rome Agapkin wrote: > i have just checked the source code of the pax-runner-platform project > and see that there is no

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

Nice ! Don't hesitate to ping if needed ! Regards JB On 18/10/2019 13:22, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2019-10-18T07:02:55 +0200 > 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > >> IMO instead of adding own support we better should convince open-source >> projects to add first-class support for

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

under required license? > > Am 18.10.19 um 06:16 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I will take a look on the Jira. As we are working on Pax JDBC, and Derby >> is used there (wrapped), we already have good OSGi support in Derby. >> >> Thanks for s

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

Hi Mark, I will take a look on the Jira. As we are working on Pax JDBC, and Derby is used there (wrapped), we already have good OSGi support in Derby. Thanks for sharing, Regards JB On 17/10/2019 21:09, 'Mark Raynsford' via OPS4J wrote: > Hello! > > I recently posted to the Derby list because

Re: Servlet Filters registered, activated but not processing request

Hi As said, I did a fix on pax web 7.2.10 about twice service registration. It might help. Regards JB Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 19:41, Nhut Thai Le a écrit : > We recently upgrade to pax-web 7.2.10 and i haven't seen this happen again > yet. Even with 7.2.4 it only happened a few times, I'll

Re: PAXWEB 7.3.x - release?

+1, go for it I will deal with 7.2.11 release. Thanks Regards JB Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 03:59, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I'm planning to release pax web 7.3.4 with recent fixes and dependency > upgrades. > > Please mind, that this is *not* a version to be used in upcoming Karaf

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

Yeah, I'm fixing the latest itests issues and we are good to go. The release will happen very soon. Regards JB Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 08:08, DEREK MCKEOWN a écrit : > Hi, > > Any updates on this? > > Regards > Derek > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 29 Aug 2019,

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

; > On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 11:59:53 AM UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Yes, it's plan to cut a release this week. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 12:40, Jens Kordowski a >> écrit : >>

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

Hi Yes, it's plan to cut a release this week. Regards JB Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 12:40, Jens Kordowski a écrit : > Hi, > > I was wondering when there will be a new 7.2.x release of pax web. Any > plans? > > Best regards > Jens > > -- > -- > -- > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org -

Re: pax-web-extender-whiteboard Servlet filters ordering

Hi, Sorry, I meant 7.3.x ;) Regards JB On 12/08/2019 20:25, Nhut Thai Le wrote: > Hi JB, > > I haven't tried 4.3.x, but mine is 7.2.4 and it is much latter. Can > you elaborate why i should try an older version? > > Thai > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:48

Re: pax-web-extender-whiteboard Servlet filters ordering

Hi Did you try with pax web 4.3.x ? Regards JB Le lun. 12 août 2019 à 17:33, Nhut Thai Le a écrit : > Hello, > > I am using paxweb 7.2.4 and I have 4 servlet filters, annotated with > service.ranking from 0 -> 3, according to the osgi cmpn 6/7, the filter > with higher rank will be executed

Re: filter.init in pax-web-extender-whiteboard 7.2.4 does not populate FilterConfig object

Hi, I'm already working on Pax Web currently (starting R7 support), I will take a look on this one as well. Regards JB On 31/07/2019 06:44, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > This could be a bug. > There are two more issues related to incorrect implementation of R6 > Whiteboard: >  -

Re: [PAXLOGGING] JDK 11 support

Sweet ! Thanks ! Regards JB Le mer. 24 juil. 2019 à 14:29, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > Just for your information - I fixed master and paxlogging-1.11.x so all > integration (native and Karaf) tests work under JDK8 and JDK11. > > best regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > -- > -- >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Releasing 1.11.0 soon?

Hey I'm working on it. I will cut 1.10.2 tomorrow and then I will move forward on 1.11.0 just after. Regards JB Le mar. 23 juil. 2019 à 20:12, Markus Rathgeb a écrit : > Definitely, I would like to update master to 2.0.0 version with OSGi R7 >> support (PAXLOGGING-255 I started during the

Re: Releasing pax-jdbc and pax-jms (problem at Sonatype)

Thanks I already sent an email about that. It should be on the way. I have some pax releases on the way. Regards JB Le jeu. 18 juil. 2019 à 08:19, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I created https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-50164 to track the > problem with the release of

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Release 4.13.2?

Hi I will. Thanks. Regards JB Le lun. 15 juil. 2019 à 09:56, Arnoud Glimmerveen < arnoudglimmerv...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi all, > > There is a relatively minor change already merged in the 4.x branch that > enables Pax Exam to 'play nice' with more recent versions of compendium > services

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

ow). > > Shall I create a JITA task for the undertow container (though I will > not be able to actually fix the issue there)? > > Best regards > Stephan > > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2019 20:33:58 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > > Thanks Stephan > > I will

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

ause while the change makes the websocket test run on > tomcat it has side effects on other tests (without websockets). > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019 13:25:01 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >> >> +1 to reuse PAXWEB-1027, and happy to work with you on this one ;) >>

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

i, > > when I first started to look into websockets, there needed to be > extra Bundles installed for Jetty. > That's about 4 to 5 years ago :) > But I haven't looked into the annotations, as far as I can remember. > > Regards, Achim > > > A

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

his should work > via servletContext.getAttribute("javax.websocket.server.ServerContainer");). > There is probably all the websocket infrastructure missing in the > Pax-Web classes. > > Best regards > Stephan > > On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 3:40:22 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

Hi, AFAIR, it's not yet fully supported. But easy to add/fix, I will tackle that. Regards JB On 25/06/2019 15:25, Stephan Siano wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question concerning web sockets in Pax-Web: > > A colleague of mine is trying to deploy a war on a Pax-Web container > that contains some

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

prior? > > thanks, Achim > > > Am Do., 20. Juni 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré > mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>>: > > Hi Jürgen, > > I will check the status and eventually cut the release. > > I keep you posted. > >

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

Hi Jürgen, I will check the status and eventually cut the release. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 20/06/2019 10:48, Jürgen Schmid wrote: > Hi laeubi, > > just wanted to check the current release status. > Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down >

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

mponent.jms.JmsComponent"> >         ref="jmsConsumerConnectionFactory"/> >     >      >     class="org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsComponent"> >         ref="jmsProducerConnectionFactory"/> >     > > On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 3:59:28 PM UTC+2,

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

wo connections per instance, in this case? I have > to verify this thing with my previous implementation (while deploying > broker as an artifact). > > Regards, > Cooshal. > > On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 3:45:41 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

Hi, That's the way JMS works. You create a ConnectionFactory. The connection factory provides connections. A connection provides several sessions. A session is single threaded, and "assigned" to an action (consume or produce). So, inside a single connection (for one client), you can have bunch

Re: Problems running pax exam with openjdk-11

You can't use Felix framework 6 as it's OSGi R7. I will take a look on your branch. I can confirm that karaf itests, including pax jdbc work in itest. Regards JB Le sam. 15 juin 2019 à 13:52, Steinar Bang a écrit : > I've pushed my current jdk11/pax exam experiments to this branch >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Releasing 1.11.0 soon?

Hi, +1 for 1.11.0, I will test on karaf-4.2.x branch (maybe 1.10.2 to cherry-pick PAXLOGGING-257 is also an option). Definitely, I would like to update master to 2.0.0 version with OSGi R7 support (PAXLOGGING-255 I started during the week end). Regards JB On 03/06/2019 12:08, Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] New integration tests

Awesome ! Thanks ! I will take a look during the weekend. Cheers JB On 16/05/2019 17:39, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello! > > Even more integration tests (including Logback) - I finally created > the tests I always wanted - that restart/refresh pax-logging bundles > inside the test itself! > >

Re: bundle not resolved due to pax-jdbc while provisioning in karaf

e: javax.sql.DataSource;multiple:=false;filter=(osgi.jndi >  .service.name > <http://service.name>=dw-datasource),org.apache.karaf.cellar.core.ClusterM >  anager;multiple:=false,org.osgi.service.cm.ConfigurationAdmin;multipl >  e:=false > Require-Capability: osgi.ee <htt

Re: Pax-exam with java11+ for karaf4

:11 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> I will take a look but probably the launcher to update. >> >> Le dim. 21 avr. 2019 à 11:39, Gareth Healy a >> écrit : >> >>> I am trying to get pax-exam testing karaf4 on java11 but looking at the >

  1   2   >