An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Warren
Kumari, a Chair of the opsawg working group.
-
Working Group Name: Operations and Management Area Working Group
Area Name: Operations and Management Area
Session
Hi there,
[Copying GROW WG as this might be relevant to their coverage areas]
The document seems to be a good start but covers only standard
communities. This is not sufficient given the universal deployment of 4
octet ASNs. Both extended communities [RFC4360] and large communities
[RFC8092]
Hi Tianran,
Nice summary.
I think some of the confusion may be that
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification shows "Network Service YANG
Modules" on the interface between OSS/BSS and the network. But the "customer
service model" is at a different place in the hierarchy as shown in Figure 4
Hi,
Based on the discussion, here I try to clean up the confusion of the two I-Ds.
[draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification] classifies the yang modules into
"Network Service YANG Module" and the "Network Element YANG Module". And
usually, it uses "service module" to imply the "Network
