Hey Luis,
As we are updating the draft for last call comment, here are responses to your
comments.
> *Specific comments*
>
> - There are several sentences along the document trying to define the scope of
> service model in the context of IETF. These are: (1) in Terms and Concepts,
for
> Service,
Dear all,
Fred (Baker) has kindly accepted to review the NPTv6 part of this
specification. Many thanks to him.
This new version integrates the comments raised by Fred. The main changes are:
- Specify the interface(s) on which the translation function applies. The model
allows to characterize
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Network Address Translation
(NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)
Hi Carl,
I'm in the process of updating the document and wanted to let you know what
changes are being made.
>>> - The term “Network Service Model” in RFC 8199 is intended to cover both
>>>"Customer Service Model” as well as “Service Delivery Model” as defined
>>>in draft-ietf-opsawg-se
Hi Dan,
Thank for the review.
I'm currently updating the document. Here are my answers to your comments.
> Comment #1 - The current abstract could be simmered down to:
>
> The IETF has produced a number of data modules in the YANG modelling
> language. The majority of these modules are used t
