[OPSAWG] Move forward draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-02

Hi All, Thanks authors for incorporating all the comments during the WGLC. And we have received all responses to the IPR call. So let's move forward and request the publication. Please see the status information https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained/ Cheers,

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-pularikkal-opsawg-wifi-calling-03.txt

I have read through this draft. The deployment considerations provided are useful. I made a few suggested changes which I hope may help. Under session 2 Terminology: Groups Special Mobile Association (GSMA) - Are you sure this is right for the acronym GSMA? I thought although GSM was originally

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Robert, As I wrote earlier, this was a great review.  Thanks for that.  Please see below. On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Almost Ready > > This is an exciting concept, and the draft overall is approachable. I > have identified a few areas I thi

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Hi Eliot, Reply in line below: On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > Hi Ranga, > > Robert wrote a great review, and I'll respond to him in due course with > suggested changes. I wanted to take just a moment to comment to you on > your point: > > On 8/31/17 12:00 AM, M. Ranganath

Re: [OPSAWG] IoT-DIR early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Hi Henk, On 8/30/17 6:50 PM, Henk Birkholz wrote: > Hello Eliot, > > thank you for your fast feedback! I still have some comments and > questions for another round, though. I hope that is okay - please see > comments in-line. Soon, please. > >> Ok, but a cautionary note: this draft intentionally

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Hi Ranga, Robert wrote a great review, and I'll respond to him in due course with suggested changes.  I wanted to take just a moment to comment to you on your point: On 8/31/17 12:00 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Robert Sparks > wr

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

I think we need to bear in mind that the MUD files constitute recommendations for how a device should be treated and what policies/security should be applied to it by a network. This draft, in itself, cannot allow a manufacturer to actually proscribe anything. Today, the only way to achieve what