Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm not the responsible AD for draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang but let me share > my view from a YANG point of view. > Do we really believe that the intended status of Standards Track of > Experimental will

Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community

Paolo, I don't speak for the authors here, just my opinion. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:37:59PM +0100, Paolo Lucente wrote: > One concern is that this looks a very isolated effort, ie. why communities > and not as-path? I remember the story of this draft, it comes from field > needs and that is

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

Dear all, I'm not the responsible AD for draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang but let me share my view from a YANG point of view. Do we really believe that the intended status of Standards Track of Experimental will influence whether a YANG module is implemented? This module will be implemented if it

Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community

Hi, With the hat of the developer of a open-source / free IPFIX collector (*, **), I would like to express two opposite concerns with regards to this draft - loosely related to the very details of the draft itself. One concern is that this looks a very isolated effort, ie. why communities and

[OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-17.txt

This contains one description correction that Joe caught. --- Begin Message --- A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-17.txt has been successfully submitted by Eliot Lear and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud Revision: 17 Title:

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-17.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification Authors : Eliot Lear

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-16.txt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/21/18 06:37, Eliot Lear wrote: > Changes as discussedd. Thanks, Eliot. I'm still seeing what I think is a copy and paste issue in the main YANG module: augment "/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:aces/" +

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-16.txt

Changes as discussedd. On 21.02.18 12:35, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group > WG of the IETF. > > Title :

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-16.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification Authors : Eliot Lear

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-08.txt

A quick review shows that many of my comments have been addressed, thanks. This significantly clarifies the document. Some comments are still unaddressed. And, the Security Considerations section contains substantial portions of my text as I pointed out earlier, with no acknowledgement