Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks for your responses. Inline responses to EKRs responses. I think there were some additional recent on list comments that still need to be addressed and any adjustments from this discussion. I just posted to the datatracker as it didn't seem like we needed to use github now that there

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thank you. -Ekr On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > No worries. Looking forward to your thoughts on my comments. > > > > Me too! I've created a repo >

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > No worries. Looking forward to your thoughts on my comments. > Me too! I've created a repo (https://github.com/wkumari/effect-encrypt) where I'll be placing the new version to all for easier viewing / diffs. W > -Ekr > >

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

No worries. Looking forward to your thoughts on my comments. -Ekr On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Kathleen Moriarty < kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I wasn’t able to task switch to editing the document yesterday with > other work obligations. > > Best, > Kathleen > > Sent

Re: [OPSAWG] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Kathleen, > On Feb 22, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: > > Hi Alissa, > > I believe this is the last set of comments received that we had left > to respond. The next update that will come out shortly following this > message should address

[OPSAWG] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-22: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-22: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Sorry, I wasn’t able to task switch to editing the document yesterday with other work obligations. Best, Kathleen Sent from my mobile device > On Feb 28, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Warren Kumari

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04

I am having trouble reconciling two of your comments. In you rlast email you said that this is for "planed communities represent the groups of customers peers an geographical and topological related information". Planned communities is presumably a new behavior, not existing behavior. In

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: > > Hi, Benoit, > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Claise > wrote: > >> > >> The way I

Re: [OPSAWG] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: > > Hi, Benoit, > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Claise > wrote: > >> > >> The way I