[OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-16 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi authors and working group. I just had cause to read this document and thought I would share my comments on the list. The draft appears as -00, but it is a little more mature than that implies because it replaces draft-song-ntf-02. I think a foundation document on telemetry would be useful fo

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs

2018-10-16 Thread David Carrel (carrel)
No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. David Carrel dcar...@viptela.com car...@cisco.com On 10/10/18, 2:42 PM, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" wrote: Authors, contributors, and WG members, as we are in WGLC for this document, we want to solicit knowledge of any IPR that may

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-16 Thread lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com
Dear Mr. Farrel, Thank you very muchu for your review and detailed comments. We will update the doc accordingly. As one of the authors from the operators, I think this is a good start point to contine the telemetry related work in OPSAWG. We belive telemetry will be used in the network to enhan

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-16 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for your careful review and comments. On this discussion: "In 1.4 you have Since SNMP is poll-based, it incurs low data rate and high processing overhead. I don't think this is quite fair on SNMP. The protocol also includes Notifications allowing information