Thanks. Much better!
> Am 06.12.2018 um 15:08 schrieb Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:18 AM Stewart Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:55, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> > Hi Spencer, Stewart, Joel,
> >
> > Thanks for the discussion about the congestion
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:18 AM Stewart Bryant
wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:55, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> > Hi Spencer, Stewart, Joel,
> >
> > Thanks for the discussion about the congestion adaptation. We agree the
> reactive congestion adaptation may need further investigation.
> >
> > Thus in
On 06/12/2018 07:55, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
Hi Spencer, Stewart, Joel,
Thanks for the discussion about the congestion adaptation. We agree the
reactive congestion adaptation may need further investigation.
Thus in order to solve Mirja's comment, we plan to make that example more
generic
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We will fix the boilerplate in next version.
As for the security considerations, we will discuss among coauthors and come
back to you.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent:
Hi Alissa,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We will correct the improper normative language in section 7 in next version.
As for the security considerations, we will discuss among coauthors and come
back to you.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Alissa Cooper
