>> Agreed to replace the section with a simple statement that
>> obfuscation provides no integrity or replay protection. I'm assuming
>> this refers just to 10.1 and not the whole of 10.
>>
> [Joe] I think you could probably replace a large portion of 10.2, 3 and 4
> as well.
hyperbole is not
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andrej Ota wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Thank you for taking time to review the document. Answers are in-line.
>
> > On 22 Apr 2019, at 04:49, Joseph Salowey via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Joseph Salowey
> > Review result: Serious
Hi Joseph,
Thank you for taking time to review the document. Answers are in-line.
> On 22 Apr 2019, at 04:49, Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joseph Salowey
> Review result: Serious Issues
>
> As the draft mentions the MD5 based stream cipher used by TACACS+ is
>
