> On 19 Jul 2019, at 16:29, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
>
> Hello, authors. I’ve been reading through the drafts to be presented at IETF
> 105, and I just got through this draft.
>
> I have some questions on the ietf-mud-reporter model. Would this model be
> implemented on the MUD controll
> On Jul 20, 2019, at 06:46, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 16:29, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
>>
>> Hello, authors. I’ve been reading through the drafts to be presented at
>> IETF 105, and I just got through this draft.
>>
>> I have some questions on the ietf-mud-reporter
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019, 9:24 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 2019, at 06:46, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >
> >
>
> >>
> >> I see you’re using a 32-bit int for the drop-count. Would it not make
> sense to make this a 64-bit counter instead? Yeah, this number should be
> low, but if some
Most discussion has, co-chair hat off, be circling around some minimal
working API mechanism to get things started.
That said, one could easily imagine, for example, something as simple as an
additional API boolean key,
"quarantined": true|false,
Perhaps once there's some experience with 771
