Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf

2019-09-27 Thread Haoyu Song
Hi Adrian, Thanks for the detailed review. I'll update the draft accordingly. Meanwhile I'd like to also request all the other authors and WG members to help review and improve this document, so we can have a new version before next IETF meeting. Haoyu -Original Message- From: Adrian

[OPSAWG] Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf

2019-09-27 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi authors, WG, I needed to read this document to check out a couple of things, and so here is a review that I collected along the way. I hope it is useful. In general, I found the document a help collection of thoughts on the space and I encourage more work to refine it. Best regards, Adrian

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-gray-sampled-streaming-01.txt

2019-09-27 Thread Gray, Andrew A
That’s a good point, and one I hadn’t considered before. I think an implementation would be relatively straight forward for this use case – your capture points would be listed as one per interface, and the points reporting a 1:1 mapping of the interfaces. I believe the YANG model is flexible

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-gray-sampled-streaming-01.txt

2019-09-27 Thread Dmytro Shytyi
Hello, Is it possible that this approach is applicable to non ASIC equipment? For example the devices that are running NFVIs (uCPE I-D "opsawg vysm") with x86 capabilities. Normally the tcpdump/tshark can be started in this kind of devices. One can imagine that this yang model variables could