Hi, Roque:
Should rd-pool-name be defined in L3SM, how does upper layer OSS the RD pool
list and related names?
If rd-pool-name is introduced only for troubleshooting, should a separate NBI
interface should be defined to expose RD pool resource to the upper layer OSS
and maintain the binding
Speak as author of this document, support for publication.
-Qin
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2020年6月1日 10:25
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: OpsAWG-Chairs
主题: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-03
Hi WG,
The authors requested the WG
Add the deadline explicitly here.
The WG LC will end on June, 14.
Thanks,
Tianran
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 10:25 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: OpsAWG-Chairs
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC:
I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
-Qin
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2020年6月1日 10:37
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: OpsAWG-Chairs
主题: [OPSAWG] IPR poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-03
Working Group, Authors,
As a part of
Working Group, Authors,
As a part of the WGLC, this email starts the IPR poll.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework/
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-03?
There are currently no IPR disclosure.
Hi WG,
The authors requested the WG last call. And we think this draft is mature and
stable. We start a two week last call for this draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework/
Please send your comments stating whether you believe the document is
