Hi guys,
Thanks for all your advices. It seems that having a service models common
types can be positive and on the other hand, we have all a lot of warnings to
do it with care, (not just extracting everything that seems common, types,
groupings, containers.. which can be a bad outcome).
Dear OPSAWG colleagues,
Thanks for participating in the call last week in the L3NM and
L2NM module discussions.
Please find bellow the minutes. The presented material is available in
https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/l3nm/blob/master/Meetings/20200528/l3nm_20200428.pptx
* Date:
I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-03.
Chongfeng
De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Tianran Zhou
Envoyé : lundi 1 juin 2020 04:37
À : opsawg@ietf.org
Cc : OpsAWG-Chairs
Objet : [OPSAWG] IPR poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-mode
Hi,
As one of the contributors, I too believe this draft is ready for publication.
Cheers,
Christian.
De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de
xie...@chinatelecom.cn
Envoyé : mardi 2 juin 2020 11:04
À : opsawg
Cc : opsawg-chairs
Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-m
Hi, folks,
As a co-author, I believe this document is ready for publication. Thanks!
Chongfeng
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 10:25 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: OpsAWG-Chairs
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-model-autom
