[OPSAWG] Ops AD office hours

2020-07-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Rob Wilton (our newest AD) asked that we pass this on concerning Ops AD office hours for IETF 108: Warren and I appreciate that the current COVID situation is tricky for everyone. Added to that, I am also a new AD and many of you may not know me. Normally at the IETF meetings you have the oppo

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07

2020-07-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Thanks, Rob. Maybe it’s just me, but your email is truncated as you can see below. I also didn’t see any attachment. Joe > On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:52, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > Apologies for the delay, but please find my AD review of the TACACS+ YANG > module draft. > > I would like t

[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07

2020-07-10 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Apologies for the delay, but please find my AD review of the TACACS+ YANG module draft. I would like to thank the authors for their work on this document, and the WG for providing reviews and input in this document. I believe that the document is in good shape but propose some minor changes to

Re: [OPSAWG] Timeline to decide to go with the common module in L3NM/L2NM, upload and present current version?

2020-07-10 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Hi Tom, Tianran, Thanks for all the suggestions! We are preparing now the draft so the common module proposal can be properly reviewed. Best Regards, Oscar De: Tianran Zhou Enviado el: viernes, 10 de julio de 2020

Re: [OPSAWG] RADIUS Extension, Getting Started

2020-07-10 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jul 10, 2020, at 8:08 AM, Massameno, Dan wrote: > Thank you for your thorough review. I am completely new to the IETF process > (I don't even know what a "nit" is) and I'm looking forward to the process. "nitpick". i.e. minor point which should be fix, but isn't very important. The IET

Re: [OPSAWG] Timeline to decide to go with the common module in L3NM/L2NM, upload and present current version?

2020-07-10 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi Tom, Yeap. That's what we've suggested the authors. Thanks, Tianran -- Sent from WeLink 发件人:tom petch 收件人:Oscar González de Dios ;opsawg 时 间:2020-07-10 18:28:27 主 题:Re: [OPSAWG] Timeline to decide to go with the common module in L3NM/L2NM

Re: [OPSAWG] RADIUS Extension, Getting Started

2020-07-10 Thread Massameno, Dan
Alan, Thank you for your thorough review. I am completely new to the IETF process (I don't even know what a "nit" is) and I'm looking forward to the process. I did want to dive into one of the last comments you made. Even if the various nits and and issues above were fixed, this propo

Re: [OPSAWG] Timeline to decide to go with the common module in L3NM/L2NM, upload and present current version?

2020-07-10 Thread tom petch
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Oscar González de Dios Sent: 09 July 2020 12:34 Hi Joe, Tianran, During las weeks we’ve been working in the common module proposal. There have been many interactions with cross-reviews of each proposal (more than 50 pull requests in the last weeks) It has been alrea