Hi Shuanglong and Rob,
First of all thank you very much for this question. I think they are very valid
and good, but also occurring quiet often. I like share my view in OPSAWG.
Regarding BMP, please involve the GROW working group as well.
The problem space you are describing is addressed in
Hi Rob,
Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will also discuss this in the LSVR
or RTGWG workgroup.
As you mentioned, the draft is about IS-IS PDUs. This is why I am not inclined
to continue to expand based on YANG.
In addition, draft-gray-sampled-streaming-03 is an very interesting
Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> 0
> LINKTYPE_NULL
> BSD loopback encapsulation
>
>
> [plus more details]
Guy asked in response to this:
> Do we need the symbolic name? Those may become part of a future API in
> libpcap that provides raw pcapng blocks - or we might
I asked IANA in ticket #1186419 two questions:
> 1) We wonder if IANA would prefer to receive this list in another
> form.
>Your XML format as an appendix CODE BEGINs?
>We likely would write code to turn the XML format into a table
>for libpcap and wireshark...
IANA> This would be
One correction. I had intended the LSR WG rather than the LSVR WG.
Regards,
Rob
From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: 06 January 2021 09:37
To: Chenshuanglong ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: Lizhenbin ; Guyunan ;
chenhua...@gsta.com
Subject: RE: IETF 109 - OPSAWG presentation
Hi Shuanglong,
[As a contributor]
I’m not that familiar with BMP and I’m not sure whether the BMP or routing
experts are on the OPSAWG list. If you have not already done so, then
presenting this work in RTGWG and LSVR WGs may help see if there are more
interested parties in those WGs, if you
hi all,
I presented network-monitoring-igp draft at IETF 109, see attached.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gu-opsawg-network-monitoring-igp-00
We suggest to use BMP to monitor IGPs to avoid setting too many monitoring
protocols for different control plane protocols.
In addition, it
