Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

2021-03-22 Thread Victor Lopez
Dear all, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Regards, Victor De: OPSAWG en nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke) Enviado: lunes, 22 de marzo de 2021 14:33 Para: opsawg@ietf.org Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-03-22 Thread Victor Lopez
Dear all, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Regards, Victor De: OPSAWG en nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke) Enviado: lunes, 22 de marzo de 2021 14:34 Para: opsawg@ietf.org Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm Authors,

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (YANG Data Model for TACACS+) to Proposed Standard

2021-03-22 Thread tom petch
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: 22 March 2021 13:12 On 3/22/21 07:15, Wubo (lana) wrote: > Hi Tom, Joe, > > Thanks for your review and comments. The issues will fixed in the next > revision. > > For 'leaf shared-secret', the following text will be added: > "It is highly recommended that shared

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

2021-03-22 Thread SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO
Hi OPSAWG, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Regards, Samier Barguil Transport & IP Networks | GCTIO - Technology | CIT Centro Integrado de Transporte | Móvil +57 3017026430 Móvil +34 665416074 E-mail samier.barguilgiraldo@telefonica.com E-mail

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-03-22 Thread SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO
Hi OPSAWG, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Regards, Samier Barguil Transport & IP Networks | GCTIO - Technology | CIT Centro Integrado de Transporte | Móvil +57 3017026430 Móvil +34 665416074 E-mail samier.barguilgiraldo@telefonica.com E-mail

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-03-22 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Re-, No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joe > Clarke (jclarke) > Envoyé : lundi 22 mars 2021 14:34 > À : opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : [OPSAWG] IPR CALL:

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

2021-03-22 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Joe, all, No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joe > Clarke (jclarke) > Envoyé : lundi 22 mars 2021 14:33 > À : opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : [OPSAWG] IPR CALL:

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-03-22 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Dear OPSA WG chairs, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards, Oscar -Mensaje original- De: OPSAWG En nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke) Enviado el: lunes, 22 de marzo de 2021 14:34 Para: opsawg@ietf.org Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

2021-03-22 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Dear OPSA WG chairs, no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards, Oscar -Mensaje original- De: OPSAWG En nombre de Joe Clarke (jclarke) Enviado el: lunes, 22 de marzo de 2021 14:33 Para: opsawg@ietf.org Asunto: [OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

[OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-03-22 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Authors, contributors, and WG members, as we are in WGLC for this document, we want to solicit knowledge of any IPR that may pertain to the draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm work. Please state either, "no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or, "yes, I am aware of IPR that applies

[OPSAWG] IPR CALL: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common

2021-03-22 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Authors, contributors, and WG members, as we are in WGLC for this document, we want to solicit knowledge of any IPR that may pertain to the draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common work. Please state either, "no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or, "yes, I am aware of IPR that applies

[OPSAWG] WG LC: L3NM and vpn-common documents

2021-03-22 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Hello, WG. One of the action items out of the 110 meeting was to put the L3NM (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-07) and vpn-common (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-03) documents through WG LC. The authors have said that these can work independently

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (YANG Data Model for TACACS+) to Proposed Standard

2021-03-22 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
On 3/22/21 07:15, Wubo (lana) wrote: > Hi Tom, Joe, > > Thanks for your review and comments. The issues will fixed in the next > revision. > > For 'leaf shared-secret', the following text will be added: > "It is highly recommended that shared keys are at least 32 characters long > and >

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09

2021-03-22 Thread Wubo (lana)
Hi Mohit, Thanks for the review. I will fix the nits in the next revision. Thanks, Bo -邮件原件- 发件人: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2021年3月20日 18:25 收件人: gen-...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org 主题:

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (YANG Data Model for TACACS+) to Proposed Standard

2021-03-22 Thread Wubo (lana)
Hi Tom, Joe, Thanks for your review and comments. The issues will fixed in the next revision. For 'leaf shared-secret', the following text will be added: "It is highly recommended that shared keys are at least 32 characters long and sufficiently complex with mixed different character types."