Re: [OPSAWG] Sbom versioning - draft-ietf-opawg-sbom-access

Hi Patrick > On 30 Apr 2021, at 03:04, Patrick Dwyer wrote: > > When you say multiple SBOM versions, do you mean multiple versions of SBOMs > that describe the same particular version of software? Or multiple SBOMs for > different versions of the same software? Different versions. Eliot

[OPSAWG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

Hi, I have posted the shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm. I believe that this document and draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common can now move ahead. Cheers, Adrian ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Layer 2 VPN Network YANG Model Authors : Samier Barguil

Re: [OPSAWG] conclusion: how many SBOMs to retrieve

Eliot Lear wrote: > At least from the discussion thus far, with the discovery mechanism in > draf-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access there is currently only a need to retrieve > a single SBOM. > According to both SPDX and CycloneDx folk, they have > sufficiently internalized any

[OPSAWG] LxNM Design Team -- Minutes

Dear OPSAWG, The notes of the last design meeting: Date: 29-04-2021 Participants * Raul Arco * Sergio Belloti * Luis Angel Muñoz * Erez Segev * Mohamed Boucadair * Victor Lopez * Oscar Gonzalez de dios *

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07

I support the adoption of this draft. IMO there is need for a standard YANG model allowing configuration and monitoring of services. In practical terms (taking the case where the model is implemented on the device side) service managers like systemd can be mapped to and managed according to a