Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-08: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-10 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:19:00AM +, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > > I'm not sure that draft-hegde-spring-mpls-seamless-sr is at a state of > > maturity to be a good reference here (and thus, that this example is worth > > including). > I agree. The only

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
-Message d'origine- >> De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] >> Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021 15:36 >> À : Oscar González de Dios ; >> BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg- >> cha...@ietf.org >> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org >> Objet : Re:

[OPSAWG] New Liaison Statement, "Response to LS on work progress on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) network in SG13"

2021-09-10 Thread Liaison Statement Management Tool
Title: Response to LS on work progress on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) network in SG13 Submission Date: 2021-09-10 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1757/ From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= To: gm...@kaist.ac.kr,tsbs...@itu.int Cc: The IAB Executive Director

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Thanks Med for confirming that all IETF LC comments have been resolved. I've issued the IESG ballot, it should be on the telechat in approx. 2 week's time. Regards, Rob > -Original Message- > From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > > Sent: 10 September 2021 08:14 > To: opsawg@ietf.org;

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Thanks Med for confirming that all IETF LC comments have been resolved. I've issued the IESG ballot, it should be on the telechat in approx. 2 week's time. Regards, Rob > -Original Message- > From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > > Sent: 10 September 2021 08:07 > To: Rob Wilton

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Joe, Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021 15:36 > À : Oscar González de Dios ; > BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; opsawg- > cha...@ietf.org > Cc : opsawg@ietf.org;

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
I meant responses to some of my comments. I didn't see references/definitions added for LAG and LACP (or ARP or ND). You still have "Active" and "Backup" in Figure 36 for precedence type where I think it should be Primary and Backup. Plus, in Section 6.7, you refer to Primary and Secondary.

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Hi Joe, I reviewed Med proposal and was good with it. No further points from my side for the l2nm. Oscar -Mensaje original- De: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Enviado el: viernes, 10 de septiembre de 2021 15:16 Para: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org CC:

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
I completely missed the follow-up, which I'm now reading. Thanks for addressing some of these comments. I like the boolean approach to the PW MTU. I didn't see Oscar's follow-up on some of the other points, though. I assume that's still pending? Joe On 9/10/21 03:02,

Re: [OPSAWG] Update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft

2021-09-10 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Thanks for the update, Thorsten. It seems like your plan is to get this in just under the 112 wire so it can be presented? Joe On 9/10/21 08:05, Thorsten Dahm wrote: > Hello, > > apologies for the long silence, we just wanted to check in with an > update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft. The

[OPSAWG] Update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft

2021-09-10 Thread Thorsten Dahm
Hello, apologies for the long silence, we just wanted to check in with an update on the TACACS+ (with TLS) draft. The authors are still working on the document, and we do expect to have the text ready in around ~5 weeks from now and hope for a lot of feedback from the group. Thanks,

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11.txt

2021-09-10 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Rob, all, This version integrates the IETF LC comments. Detailed replies for each review were already sent to the list. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de internet- > dra...@ietf.org > Envoyé : vendredi 10 septembre 2021

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10.txt

2021-09-10 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Rob, all, This version integrates the IETF LC comments, mainly those revived from directorate reviewers. Detailed replies for each review were already sent to the list. We are ready for the IESG review. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Chairs, all, This version integrates the comments received from Joe and Julian (as indicated in another message sent to the list). Chairs, can you please issue a WGLC for this version? Thank you. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-05.txt

2021-09-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Layer 2 VPN Network YANG Model Authors : Samier Barguil

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11.txt

2021-09-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Layer 3 VPN Network YANG Model Authors : Samier Barguil