Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Ben, Thank you. Will remove the redundant text. For some reason, the txt file generated when submitting the xml version of draft includes some "weird" text that I don’t have in the xml file: * "The model (As shown in Figure 19) ..." instead of " The model (Figure 19)..." * "The model

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Pete, Thank you for the review. I will ack this review in -15. Cheers, Med Orange Restricted > -Message d'origine- > De : Pete Resnick via Datatracker > Envoyé : mercredi 29 septembre 2021 05:19 > À : gen-...@ietf.org > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org;

[OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14

2021-09-28 Thread Pete Resnick via Datatracker
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready Got this review late; apologies for finishing it a few days later that it should. As usual for YANG reviews (not my forte), I simply looked for data items being compared in i18n-unsafe ways or other misuses. Nothing obvious. Seems ready to go as far as

[OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-28 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: L2NM document: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, We received a comment from Moti (cced) asking to extend the ES structure to allow listing its members. This allows, for example, retrieving the members independently of an L2NM service. The proposed change would be as follows: OLD: | +--rw ethernet-segment* [name] |

Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Re-, Thanks, Ben. > > [[Med]] This is to avoid misuses when the dot1q is inserted while the > type is not set to dot1q (even if the feature is supported). > > I was trying to comment on the "if-feature", not the "when" (the "when" > makes perfect sense). Basically, I don't see how the "when"

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-14.txt

2021-09-28 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Layer 3 VPN Network YANG Model Authors : Samier Barguil

Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: (with DISCUSS)

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Ben, Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Benjamin Kaduk > Envoyé : mardi 28 septembre 2021 01:51 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > Cc : The IESG ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk >

Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-10: (with COMMENT)

2021-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Ben, Thank you for the follow-up. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Benjamin Kaduk > Envoyé : lundi 27 septembre 2021 23:39 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > Cc : The IESG ; draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-com...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org;