Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-21 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Adrian, authors, WG, Warren, Martin Duke, and I looked at this document almost 2 years back, noted that the work that it is describing seemed to be close to work chartered in IPPM WG, and hence recommended to the authors, via Tianran, that this work should be presented to IPPM to see if ther

Re: [OPSAWG] Status of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf

2022-02-21 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Adrian, Sorry, this had got stuck, I had wanted to check Roman's and Ben's abstain comments. Anyway, I think that the document is in reasonable shape, and I've now pushed the button for this to proceed. I would like to thank the authors and WG for their work on this document. Regards, Rob

Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-21 Thread Haoyu Song
Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for the review and editing! We'll update the draft to reflect the latest thoughts. I agree with you that the IPv4 extension is unlikely to happen so we'll remove that part in the new revision. Best regards, Haoyu -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel