Dear OPSAWG members,
this email concludes the first WGLC call for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07.html.
A few comments where raised. Authors/editors, please go ahead and
address these as discussed on the list.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
On 14.09.22 16:07, H
Dear authors and contributors,
as a reminder: please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware
of any IPR that pertains to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-07.
State either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft."
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft."
Dear OPSAWG members,
I'd like to highlight the opportunity to become a shepherd for this I-D.
If you'd like to get more involved in the IETF community, becoming a
document shepherd is good way to get first hands-on experience. The
chairs are happy to help, will support newcomers, and provide g
Hi Med,
Comments inline below ...
I've snipped out anything that we have already reached agreement on.
> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: 23 September 2022 14:04
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-
> sap@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subje
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the follow-up.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Envoyé : jeudi 29 septembre 2022 15:24
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-sap@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : RE: AD review of draft-ietf
The CfA has concluded, and there seems to be sufficient support from the WG to
adopt this work. There has been considerable discussion supporting this work
with changes forthcoming based on those discussions. There were no voiced
objections.
Authors, please resubmit this draft as draft-ietf-o
On 9/28/2022 12:06 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
Hi Christian, just following up on this:
And following up myself. I am looking at the deltas between draft 10 and
draft 9, and while it goes in the right direction, I would love to see a
bit more work to address my main points:
1) It would be nice t
On 29.09.22 18:53, Christian Huitema wrote:
On 9/28/2022 12:06 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
Hi Christian, just following up on this:
And following up myself. I am looking at the deltas between draft 10
and draft 9, and while it goes in the right direction, I would love to
see a bit more work to a
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Updates to the TLS Transport Model for SNMP
Author : Kenneth Vaughn
Filename
This version addresses the minor editorial nits that Joe identified during the
shepherd review
Regards,
Ken Vaughn
Trevilon LLC
6606 FM 1488 RD #148-503
Magnolia, TX 77354
+1-571-331-5670 cell
kvau...@trevilon.com
www.trevilon.com
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 3:46 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
Hi Benoit, all,
> Dear IPFIX doctors, (IANA),
>
> We would like to get your feedback regarding the IANA section in
> draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-01.
> Especially, the two following information elements:
> srhFlagsIPv6:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-
> s
11 matches
Mail list logo
