Joe, et al.
I am working in a draft that includes the text suggested by Tom (e..g, "This
module makes reference to"). I have also ensured that the list of references is
accurate and properly classified between normative and informative. While
doing this, I noticed that RFC 6353 seems to treat
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Discovering and Retrieving Software Transparency and
Vulnerability Information
Authors
This draft corrects several editorial matters, and adds a small amount
of text to security considerations.
On 06.10.22 13:35, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Managemen
Dear authors and contributors,
thank you for your hard work. As it seems that all existing issues have
been resolve, we'll move the I-D to write-up in the datatracker.
Also, thanks Thomas Fossati for stepping up as shepherd!
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
On 29.09.22 10:27, Henk Birkholz w
Dear authors and contributors,
thank you for your hard work. As it seems that all existing issues have
been resolve, we'll move the I-D to write-up in the datatracker.
The resulting I-D can be found here:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-11.html
Also, a big th
On Oct 5, 2022, at 10:21 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Re-,
>
> This version fixes the type for the ADN TLV.
I would suggest also adding text on how to map RADIUS attributes to DHCPv6
options. Right now it's just
Any implementors have to read multiple documents, and th
Hi Alan,
I added an appendix for this as you can see at:
https://tinyurl.com/opsawg-add-latest.
Do we need to sway more?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alan DeKok
> Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2022 14:52
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : opsawg@ietf.org
> Obj
On Oct 6, 2022, at 9:32 AM,
wrote:
> I added an appendix for this as you can see at:
> https://tinyurl.com/opsawg-add-latest.
I missed that, sorry.
> Do we need to sway more?
No, I think this looks good.
Alan DeKok.
___
OPSAWG mailing list
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS
Authors : Mohamed Boucadair
Hi Amanda, IPFIX IE doctors,
See inline.
On 9/30/2022 4:58 AM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
Hi Benoit, all,
Dear IPFIX doctors, (IANA),
We would like to get your feedback regarding the IANA section in
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-01.
Especially, the two following information elements:
srhF
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Operational Considerations for use of DNS in IoT
devices
Authors : Michael Ric
11 matches
Mail list logo
