Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang/
The due date is Decemb
Hi Nacho,
I am not sure if I really understand this argument.
There are different lines, like Yang push, gnmi, private implementations. If
they cannot follow IETF subscription, i.e., Yang push, how could they follow an
IETF manifest? I mean they will use their own way to indicate the collection
> Hi Douglas et al.,
>
> I'd suggest to reduce your proposed model to:
>
> - The TACACS+ authentication is extended to allow the TACACS+
> client to request the SSH client's public key from the TACACS+ server,
> based on the client's public key fingerprint, for verification.
>
> This results in
