Hi Tianran,
I understand your point. In the beginning, the MDT collector would provide the
Data Collection Manifest as this component knows about the MDT subscription
details depending on the type of protocol (e.g., gNMI, YANG Push). But ideally,
the network platform would implement the manifes
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Modules for Service Assurance
Authors : Benoit Claise
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your comments, we tried to address them (see below).
The diff of the changes is here:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
Best,
Jean
> -Original Message-
> From: tom petch [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com]
> Sent: Wedn
Hello Dan,
Thanks for the review, you’ll find our answers inline.
The full diff is here:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
Best,
Jean
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday 14 Nov
Hi Bo,
Thanks for your comments. Please find our answers inline.
The full diff is here:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
Best,
Jean
> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Wu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday 21 November 202
Hello, Med. I was curious if you had a chance to dig into the IANA registries
to see where else there might be a need for updates. What we had said at 115
was that you would take a look and see what the scope of work might be. That
might turn into more docs to track those various registry cha
I find this response confusing. To me this reads that if a non-IETF telemetry
feature is used, the data manifest would in fact be up to the implementation
i.e. proprietary. However, it would seem to me that to be useful, the
information in the data manifest would need to be standardized, even
Hello WG and authors. I promised/threatened a review of this document during
opsawg after I had a chance to take a deeper look. I appreciate the
presentation both in netmod and in opsawg. Below are some contributor thoughts.
But after a deeper read, I’m perhaps a bit more confused. Ultimatel
Thanks Jean for the response and for addressing my comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:31 PM Jean Quilbeuf
wrote:
> Hello Dan,
> Thanks for the review, you’ll find our answers inline.
>
> The full diff is here:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assuran
