Hi, Adrian
Thank you so much for your comments, we are going to incorporate them to the
next version.
See
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boucadair/policy-based-network-acl/gh-pages/draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl.txt
for the proposed update, and
By that reasoning, ipfix should be changed to carry multiple destination
options, multiple hop-by-hop options, and contents of unrecognized next
headers. After all, it they occur operators would want to know.Yoyrs,Joel Sent
via the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G, an AT 5G smartphone
Dear all,
Bruno & Rob are right: "I would expect ipfix to report what’s in the
packet rather than what the IETF would like the packet to be".
This is a basic IPFIX principle.
Bruno is specifically right when he wrote: "removing this section from
the document will likely not change the
Hi Rob,
I think so.
Cheers,
Med
De : Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Envoyé : vendredi 26 mai 2023 11:47
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Andrew Alston -
IETF ; John Scudder
Cc : The IESG ; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org;
opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : RE: Andrew Alston's
My 2 cents since I've been specifically added to the thread.
This is meant as a technical feedback FYI (My own preference would be to avoid
being dragged into this controversy)
* I'm not following opsawg but Rob 's point make sense to me. I would
expect ipfix to report what's in the packet
Hi Med,
Thanks for this.
Okay, so it is plausible that we could take the paragraph from
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13, and generalize it to describe how IPFIX
can export multiple instances of the same EH, if they were to ever occur?
This would satisfy my desire to ensure that IPFIX can
Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
