Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-ymbk-opsawg-9092-update

Dear Randy, others, On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:36:08PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > ok, i am trying to make some time for this. thanks for the review! > > > In section 8 'Implementation Status', a reference could be added to > > https://www.rpki-client.org/. I extended this RPKI validator > >

Re: [OPSAWG] [Inventory-yang] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model

Hello My vote is for option 1. to adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY. I share the rationale to include its existing synergies with topology models. Thanks Luis De : Inventory-yang mailto:inventory-yang-boun...@ietf.org>> De la part de maqiufang (A) Envoy? : lundi 28

Re: [OPSAWG] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model

Hi, My preference is to go with Option 3 and create a core inventory model that could going forward be used for physical, virtual and resource logical inventory. I know the initial scope is to look at hardware and software components, but as it is a new effort we could provide the core that