RFC 9092 includes a normative reference to RFC 8805.The shepherd writeup for
draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds (which eventually became RFC 8805) calls out
this downref.
The downward references were referenced in the Last Call:
Hi,
I just wanted to let everyone know that I'm trying to charter a new "Network
Management Operations" WG. We are in the process of discussing the charter
scope, WG name, and initial work, currently on the ne...@ietf.org open mailing
list. I'm hoping to get put a draft version of the
Hi Éric,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> Envoyé : lundi 20 novembre 2023 13:18
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-upd...@ietf.org; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org;
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Noted for the second point. However, I think there is more than
> mirroring the table. I remember that we discussed deprecating values
> (?) and ensuring some consistency for future assignments vs. the
> historic range.
In what way is the
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thanks to Rob Wills and Rob Wilton (and any others that contributed to the
minutes).
The minutes from both opsawg sessions at IETF 118 (Monday and Wednesday) have
been imported from HedgeDoc and are available at
Thank you for the review, Sheng Jiang. OPSAWG appreciates it.
Joe
From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
Date: Monday, November 20, 2023 at 06:36
To: int-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update@ietf.org
, last-c...@ietf.org
, opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Intdir last call review of
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Ready with Nits
I have reviewed this document as part of the IntArea directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that
are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG
review.
Hi Michael,
Noted for the second point. However, I think there is more than mirroring the
table. I remember that we discussed deprecating values (?) and ensuring some
consistency for future assignments vs. the historic range.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Michael
