Hi John, FWIW, please find some comments at:
* pdf: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-01-rev%20Med.doc.pdf * doc: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-01-rev%20Med.doc I support this effort, however I think there is a need to adequately think the maintenance (e.g., future extensions) of the model. The document seems to implicitly impose some constraints on the duration of counters and does not consider all the discontinuity times out there. There are some IPv6-specific matters that are worth to be considered (e.g., https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7872). Of course, each time you mention TTL Hop Limit should be used for IPv6 :-) As a network may also include devices that act on L4, you need to clearly scope the model whether it includes/excludes such devices. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de Evans, John > Envoyé : lundi 4 décembre 2023 19:04 > À : opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Cc : Jeff Haas <jh...@juniper.net>; opsawg@ietf.org; Aviran Kadosh > (akadosh) <akad...@cisco.com> > Objet : [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-opsawg-evans- > discardmodel-01.txt > > Hi opsawg Chairs, > > Following the presentation and feedback at IETF 118, we have checked > in a 01 revision, incorporating feedback received. > > The feedback was generally supportive, and subsequent discussions in > the WG reinforce the need for a defined discard classification model: > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail > archive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fopsawg%2FprKsIkL1aY1EQUDRHle1k3mYosk%2 > F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C4f284bac73ec456289d6 > 08dbf4f38348%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638373098953 > 518366%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ > BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VR67Q%2BS7TmJ%2BeiyP > cytDxhZy56qBdXzAheW7NwFQNiM%3D&reserved=0 > > Hence, we would like to request that the draft be considered for WG > adoption. > > Cheers > > John > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
