https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-11=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12=--html
Hi!
Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> This document needs a grammar review, preferably by somebody whose task
> is to edit documents. Also, the
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
Title: Operational Considerations for use of DNS in IoT devices
Authors: Michael Richardson
Wei
Hi,
Many thanks for catching the error.
The mistake is correctly identified, and the proposed resolution is correct.
That is:
In section 5.1, the incorrect current text:
“This field is optional (since the information may not be available). The
rem_addr_len indicates the length of the user
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-11.txt is
> now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area
> Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
>Title: Operational Considerations for use of DNS in IoT
Hi Authors,
Here are my review comments on the above draft. They are divided between
Overall, Major, Minor and Nit comments. Rob’s comments might have covered some
of them, in which case feel free to ignore.
Overall:
This document needs a grammar review, preferably by somebody whose task is
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-11.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
Title: Operational Considerations for use of DNS in IoT devices
Authors: Michael Richardson
Wei
{noting that you reviewed -08, and we are up to -10 since, so some of
your comments/text are no longer applicable}
Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> I’ve just re-reviewed -10.I still think that the English to be cleaned
> up further. I know that the RFC editor would likely find and fix
Dear authors and contributors,
as a part of the adoption process, the chairs would also like to issue a
first IPR call on the content of adoption candidates (there will also be
a second IPR call after successful WGLC).
Please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management-04.html
ending on Thursday, February 22nd.
As a reminder, this I-D specifies a YANG Module for Incident Management.
Incidents in this context
