Re: [OPSAWG] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-07

2024-05-01 Thread Russ Housley
Doug: > Many thanks for the review, Russ! > > Please see below the initial changes based upon your comments, hopefully they > have met the intent. Please advise if the updates are not addressing what you > had in mind, or for any concerns. > > Best Regards, > > The Authors. > > >

Re: [OPSAWG] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-07

2024-05-01 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Many thanks for the review, Russ! Please see below the initial changes based upon your comments, hopefully they have met the intent. Please advise if the updates are not addressing what you had in mind, or for any concerns. Best Regards, The Authors. From: Russ Housley via Datatracker

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-05-01 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi, I support adoption. Just one comment - In-Packet OAM: > The OAM messages are carried as part of data traffic. This was sometimes > referred to as "in-band". I wonder if "message" is the correct term here. In the example that follow for IOAM you use the term "information". Thanks! Dhruv