Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-07.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
Title: Export of On-Path Delay in IPFIX
Authors: Thomas Graf
Benoit Claise
Alex Huang Fen
Hi Ron,
Thank you for the review.
This will be ACKed in the next iteration.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ron Bonica via Datatracker
> Envoyé : dimanche 7 juillet 2024 02:51
> À : ops-...@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue@ietf.org; last-
> c...@ietf.o
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the review.
OK to cite 7872 in Section 3.6.
Cheers,
Med
Orange Restricted
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Erik Kline via Datatracker
> Envoyé : samedi 6 juillet 2024 03:10
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v...@ietf.org; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org; o
Hi chairs,
We would like to present a CCAMP draft in OPSAWG, which is related with
resource performance monitoring.
The draft was designed for optical technology only at the beginning, but some
IP experts considered it's also applicable for IP technology.
So we would like to present this draft
[Adding NMOP chairs]
Or even NMOP, if we are not sure if it is a language (YANG) issue. NMOP is
tasked to look at all operator issues, including any scale issues.
Cheers.
> On Jul 7, 2024, at 5:19 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
>
> Hello, Xueyan. I cannot view the PPT in this liaison, but t
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption for
draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-01.
Despite the general vacation time around several place on the globe, we
received some positive feedback and no objections.
Taking into account the previous list discussion a
Hello, Xueyan. I cannot view the PPT in this liaison, but the context around
it seems like netmod might be more suited to this work and your presentation.
I see you’ve also included netmod and Netconf in the liaison audience, so
perhaps you agree that there is expertise there.
Alternatively t
