Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model

2022-05-02 Thread Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai)
Joe, I think you meant IPFIX and/or YANG model. We removed the SNMP MIB references and updated the RFC6728 references. Regards, Anand Arokiaraj From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 7:10 PM To: Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai) ; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model

2022-05-01 Thread Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai)
comments. Regards, Anand Arokiaraj From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 6:09 PM To: Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai) ; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: Review of draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model Thanks for addressing these. I hope to see more WG reviews soon

Re: [OPSAWG] Review of draft-arokiarajseda-ipfix-data-export-yang-model

2022-04-10 Thread Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai)
Hi Joe, Thanks for your feedback! The comments show that we have not entirely come out of replacing-RFC-6728-mode. Please find our responses inline ([Anand/Marta]). In addition to this, we will also remove the references to the IPFIX MIB since they are already part of RFC 6728

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption: draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model

2020-05-06 Thread Arokiaraj, Anand (Nokia - IN/Chennai)
Hi, IPFIX has been quite a useful tool for bulk data export. But the configuration model has posed quite a bit of a challenge in integrating IPFIX into the contemporary Netconf-Yang systems (no interface-ref, lists without keys, etc). The model proposed in