Re: [OPSAWG] Individual Draft on information exposure - Request for presentation slot

2024-03-07 Thread Roland.Schott
Hi Tianran, thank you for feedback and your hint. We will address this also to IPPM. In case the WG has interest, send us feedback please. We would appreciate an alternative presentation opportunity in this WG, too. There is also a public side meeting regarding this topic. In case somebody of th

[OPSAWG] Individual Draft on information exposure - Request for presentation slot

2024-03-06 Thread Roland.Schott
Dear OPSAWG and Chairs, we were wondering if you would allow us to present for 5 minutes our draft on exposure of communication and compute information at IETF-119. We have addressed this to the OPSAWG because we think this the appropriate place to discuss this topic. Name: draft-rcr

Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management-04

2024-02-21 Thread Roland.Schott
Hi, regarding the adoption of the draft as WG item, I think this is a good idea to work on. I have in mind that there has been the aim align the ietf-incident-semantic-metadata.yang with draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management. In case this has not been done so far, I suggest having a look into t

Re: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03

2023-09-22 Thread Roland.Schott
Hi, I think this is an interesting topic and the addressed use case seems to be promising. The question, whether a DPI is needed to effectively implement this is also interesting. In case it could be avoided it will in my opinion an implementation advantage. I saw a lot of positive feedback reg