Warren Kumari writes:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.
I'm up for it being adopted. However, it needs work before going
forward (but hey, that's what a WG is for).
--
Wes Hardaker
Parsons
___
OPSAWG
implementable as-is. It'd need to use a private
registration, both for in-packet identifiers and for oid identifiers.
--
Wes Hardaker
Parsons
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
MUST: usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol
SHOULD: usmHMAC256SHA512AuthProtocol
--
Wes Hardaker
Parsons
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
"Randy Presuhn" writes:
> Would you prefer to accomplish this by re-opening the Host-Resources-MIB,
> or by creating a new MIB module (Host-Resources-Extensions-MIB)?
I'd like a new MIB that drops the new objects into the existing
structures :-)
But... there is no precede
st some assurance that the
> major code bases might get updated, the main value of a document
> would be to describe the shortcoming and other possible operational
> workarounds, if they exist.
Speaking with my vendor hat on: Net-SNMP would almost certainly add
support for the
should be.
FYI, I support the standardization of additional objects to the HR mib.
There are a number of requests I've heard over time that have needed to
add additions to the HR mib, and this is really just one of a few.
--
Wes Hardaker
SPARTA, Inc.
___
amount of the storage represented
>by this entry that is available to
>non-superusers, in units of
>hrStorageAllocationUnits."
> ::= { hrExtStorageEntry 8 }
(which is a
I very much realize that there are tool-ways around doing things. And
they should be used, I agree.
--
Wes Hardaker
My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/
My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
___
OPSAWG
the first place".
But I realize that's not the right approach in terms of optimizing for
the author, reviewers, iesg, etc.
--
Wes Hardaker
My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/
My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
I at all, it's how we
let ourselves use the SMI in publications "don't change it at all, even
when it's safe to do so".
[note that conformance statements aren't a problem, IMHO, you just need
to add another and let the existing one remain. A device can sti
10 matches
Mail list logo
