> Could you provide any more details on what specifically is being > patented? Given that the document does not define new protocol mechanics > and only adds in codepoints and element encodings, what can be > practically patented there?
Indeed. Please just withdraw the IPR. Or, shall we write another without the IPR? * I'd have read the patent application, but the registration form on the CN patent search page does not appear to work. http://www.pss-system.gov.cn/sipopublicsearch/inportal/i18n.shtml?params=902F004CA61084A284089435EAAEA94F59CC921A916ADCEB _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
