Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

2022-12-01 Thread Jürgen Schönwälder
Indeed. The more important action though would be to tell IANA... /js On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:01:30PM -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Hi - > > There *is* an issue - the first two possible values spelled out > in the DESCRIPTION clause do not match the enumerated SYNTAX > values' labels. > >

Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

2022-12-01 Thread Randy Presuhn
Hi - There *is* an issue - the first two possible values spelled out in the DESCRIPTION clause do not match the enumerated SYNTAX values' labels. Randy On 2022-12-01 1:46 PM, Chris Smiley wrote: Greetings, FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs On Nov 30,

Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

2022-12-01 Thread Chris Smiley
Greetings, FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Nov 30, 2022, at 6:26 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7666, > "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor". > >

[OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7666 (7258)

2022-11-30 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7666, "Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7258