Re: [OPSAWG] [IANA #1261400] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang (ns)

2022-12-11 Thread Martin Thomson
LGTM. On Sat, Dec 10, 2022, at 13:00, Amanda Baber via RT wrote: > Hi Tim (cc: opsawg WG), > > It looks like there have been a number of updates to this document in > version -10 (you would've reviewed -09). Does this need another review? > >

[OPSAWG] [IANA #1261400] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang (ns)

2022-12-09 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi Tim (cc: opsawg WG), It looks like there have been a number of updates to this document in version -10 (you would've reviewed -09). Does this need another review? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10 This is on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. If

Re: [OPSAWG] [IANA #1261400] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang (ns)

2022-11-23 Thread Tim Bray
Looks fine to me. On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:15 AM David Dong via RT < drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote: > Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG), > > As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed > registration in

[OPSAWG] [IANA #1261400] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang (ns)

2022-11-22 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG), As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang/ The due date is