Hello Tim, others,
On 2024-01-27 06:53, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
Yes, that's the correct paragraph I was referring to.
Unfortunately, RFC 2119 does actually imply that these words can't
be used in non-2119 ways:
"In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
the
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of
> draft-ietf-opsawg-
> 9092-update-09
>
> On Jan 26, 2024, at 3:53 PM, Tim Hollebeek
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's the correct paragraph I was referring to.
> >
> > Unfortunately, RFC 2119 does act
Behalf Of Randy Bush
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 4:42 PM
>> To: Tim Hollebeek via Datatracker
>> Cc: sec...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update....@ietf.org; last-
>> c...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of
> draf
